2011
DOI: 10.1117/12.884385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time-frequency approach for event detection in non-intrusive load monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…True Positives (TP) is the number of successful detections, False Positives (FP) is the number of detections that do not correspond to actual events, while False Negatives (FN) is the number of missed events. ‫ܨ‬ ଵ − score = 2 × precision × recall precision + recall (10) where ‫ܧ‬ is the number of events. Results show highly precise detection rates where the number of false positives is relatively low in both phases.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…True Positives (TP) is the number of successful detections, False Positives (FP) is the number of detections that do not correspond to actual events, while False Negatives (FN) is the number of missed events. ‫ܨ‬ ଵ − score = 2 × precision × recall precision + recall (10) where ‫ܧ‬ is the number of events. Results show highly precise detection rates where the number of false positives is relatively low in both phases.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basseville and Nikiforov [6] described various detection algorithms from which two approaches have been utilized in event-based NILM systems, namely the Generalized Likelihood Ratio (GLR) test [7,8] and the CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) filtering [9]. Jin et al [10] proposed a more robust change-point detection approach based on a Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) test. In addition, various machine learning tools such as kernel clustering [11], Hidden Markov Models (HMM) [12], and Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [13], have been proposed as solutions to address the change point detection problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expert heuristics describe mostly rule-based approaches that consider prior knowledge to define sets of parameters and thresholds [8,17]. Probabilistic models consider statistical metrics, including variance and standard deviation, to estimate the probability of a change in a time series [11,22]. Approaches of the matched-filter category try to find a universal event pattern in the signal by exceeding a likelihood threshold [27,33].…”
Section: Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do not allow to distinguish between different kinds of events or ignore undesired events. [7] 80.04 Jin et al [22] 81.01 Wild et al [35] 89.15…”
Section: Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing interest in real-time detection of any event occurrence in the power system. In [1], Jin et al introduce a joint time-frequency (TF) approach for event detection and change-point estimation in non-intrusive load monitoring. Transient disturbances are defined as short-lasting deviations of a measurement from its previous, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%