2005
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2005.851439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time-dependent Hamilton-Jacobi formulation of reachable sets for continuous dynamic games

Abstract: Abstract-We describe and implement an algorithm for computing the set of reachable states of a continuous dynamic game. The algorithm is based on a proof that the reachable set is the zero sublevel set of the viscosity solution of a particular time-dependent Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs partial differential equation. While alternative techniques for computing the reachable set have been proposed, the differential game formulation allows treatment of nonlinear systems with inputs and uncertain parameters. Because the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
779
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 943 publications
(782 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
779
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is however impossible since (w(t), x(t)) ∈ ∂C jt (q(t)) ⊂ C jt (q(t)) c , and establishes (9). Notice that if k = 0 then (9) achieves the desired contradiction.…”
Section: A Proofs Of the Safety Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is however impossible since (w(t), x(t)) ∈ ∂C jt (q(t)) ⊂ C jt (q(t)) c , and establishes (9). Notice that if k = 0 then (9) achieves the desired contradiction.…”
Section: A Proofs Of the Safety Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Notice that if k = 0 then (9) achieves the desired contradiction. We consider therefore the case when k > 0 and show that (9) implies that…”
Section: A Proofs Of the Safety Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some examples include multiagent collision avoidance [3], air combat [4], and path planning in an adversarial environment [5]. The class of pursuit-evasion games that will be considered in this paper is summarized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former reduce the problem to a sequence of finite dimensional optimization problems through discretization [8], whereas the latter solves the Isaacs partial differential equation with boundary conditions using, e.g., multiple shooting [9,10], collocation [11,12], or level-set methods [3,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%