2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.10.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time-dependent direct current potential drop method to evaluate thickness of an oxide layer formed naturally and thermally on a large surface of carbon steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ali et al discussed that the potential drop changes during the DCPD measurement is due to creep of the oxide film caused by Joule heat at the contact point (Ali, et al, 2010(Ali, et al, , 2012. In this study, the same tendencies of potential changes could be obtained in stainless steel, but they were not as clear as those Ali et al obtained from carbon steel (Ali, et al, 2010(Ali, et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ali et al discussed that the potential drop changes during the DCPD measurement is due to creep of the oxide film caused by Joule heat at the contact point (Ali, et al, 2010(Ali, et al, , 2012. In this study, the same tendencies of potential changes could be obtained in stainless steel, but they were not as clear as those Ali et al obtained from carbon steel (Ali, et al, 2010(Ali, et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The DCPD measurement system of Ali et al (Ali, et al, 2010(Ali, et al, , 2012 was used to measure the oxide film of the carbon steel. Figure 1 schematically shows the layout of the measurement system.…”
Section: A Direct Current Potential Drop Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The conductivity and thickness of the plate were 33.6 MS/m and 6 mm. It is noted that the plate conductivity was measured via the direct current potential drop method [ 25 , 26 ]. The profile and opening size of each corrosion are tabulated in Table 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%