The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.newast.2016.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time dependent approach to model X-ray and γ–ray light curves of Mrk 421 observed during the flare in February 2010

Abstract: A time dependent approach to model X-ray and γ-ray chrotron self Compton emission process. To model the observed X-ray and γ-ray light curves, we numerically solve the kinetic equation describing the evolution of particle distribution in the emission region. The injection of particle distribution into the emission region, from the putative acceleration region, is assumed to be a time dependent power law. The synchrotron and synchrotron self Compton emission from the evolving particle distribution in the emiss… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, time‐dependent single‐zone models with several injections of the radiating particles into the emission region can explain the multiwavelength blazar flares of short duration (Röken et al 2018). These models are different from the one‐zone time‐dependent models with single injection for the blazar variability at different timescales (Mastichiadis et al 2013; Singh et al 2017).…”
Section: Blazar Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, time‐dependent single‐zone models with several injections of the radiating particles into the emission region can explain the multiwavelength blazar flares of short duration (Röken et al 2018). These models are different from the one‐zone time‐dependent models with single injection for the blazar variability at different timescales (Mastichiadis et al 2013; Singh et al 2017).…”
Section: Blazar Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, time-dependent single zone models with several injections of the radiating particles into the emission region can explain the multi-wavelength blazar flares of short duration (Röken, Schuppan, Proksch, & Schöneberg, 2018). These models are different from the one-zone time dependent models with single injection for the blazar variability at different timescales (Mastichiadis, Petropoulou, & Dimitrakoudis, 2013;Singh et al, 2017).…”
Section: Multi-zone Emission Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A first interpretation of the remarkable 2010 flare of Mrk 421 using spectral modelling is given by Shukla et al (2012), Singh et al (2015) and Singh et al (2017). Singh et al (2015) model the daily averaged spectral energy distribution (SED) on MJD 55243 with a standard one-zone SSC scenario, assuming an instantaneous electron distribution that follows a broken power law.…”
Section: Previous Interpretations Of the February 2010 Flarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their scenario, the flaring state arises from a change in several parameters, including Doppler factor, magnetic field strength, electron energy density and spectral index, which is attributed to electron acceleration in a strong shock. Singh et al (2017) propose a first model of the MWL light curve during the flare, which they find to be asymmetric in the high-energy bands, with a rise that is faster than the decay. They model the flux evolution detected by Swift-XRT, MAXI, Fermi-LAT and TACTIC with a one-zone model by adjusting a time-dependent injection function, assuming a constant spectral index of about 2.0.…”
Section: Previous Interpretations Of the February 2010 Flarementioning
confidence: 99%