2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time delay method to solve non-collocated input estimation problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of the major developments in inversion of linear systems can be found in [3]. Alternative methods, namely the so-called deconvolution methods, are instead proposed in [4] and [5], while a review of frequency domain methods can be found in [6]. Of the previously mentioned approaches, only some can reconstruct both inputs and states of the system, while the reconstruction of states is also important in this work.…”
Section: Indirectly Measuring the Inputs Of A Mechanical Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the major developments in inversion of linear systems can be found in [3]. Alternative methods, namely the so-called deconvolution methods, are instead proposed in [4] and [5], while a review of frequency domain methods can be found in [6]. Of the previously mentioned approaches, only some can reconstruct both inputs and states of the system, while the reconstruction of states is also important in this work.…”
Section: Indirectly Measuring the Inputs Of A Mechanical Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the model of system state, an improved algorithm -Delayed Multistep ISF (DMISF) space is proposed by Allen to identify the time-domain load [16]. Nordström studied the load identification problem of the collocated system and non-collocated system based on the discrete state space model of the system, and used the time delay method to transform the identification of the ill-posed problem into a well-behaved one [19]. Because the inverse system method is not separated from the system state space model, it is necessary to know the prior knowledge of the system, so the application of the inverse system method is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FRF-based input estimation is an ill-posed problem in general, so the presence of noise and small deviations will cause significant errors that are far from reality [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. To overcome this issue for FRF-based methods, additional information, e.g., spatial distribution of loads, must be needed to have a unique solution [ 8 , 9 ]. Classical time and frequency domain methods for input identification also suffer from the requirement of needing an exact model, which is not possible in practice [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%