2021
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.202000409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time‐ and cost‐saving method to check the point‐to‐point distribution of soil improvers

Abstract: Background: In recent times, also in compliance with several sustainable agriculture rules, the use of soil conditioners, such as zeolites, progressively increased. Zeolites are minerals characterized by unique physical‐chemical properties, which make them able to control the mobility of water, ammonium and other cations in soils. As zeolites do not exhaust their properties over time, it would be appropriate to check for their correct distribution in the amended soil. Aims: We present an efficient and inexpens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to several other recent studies in which this specific chabazitic-zeolitite was used, the total CEC was assumed to be 2.17 meq g −1 (of which 1.46 because of Ca 2+ , 0.60 to K + , 0.07 to Na + and 0.04 to Mg 2+ ) (Ferretti, Keiblinger, et al, 2020, Ferretti et al, 2019Malferrari et al, 2021Malferrari et al, , 2013. The particle size distribution was mainly characterized by silt particles, as demonstrated by X-ray sedimentation analysis (0.4% between 250 and 125 μm (fine sand), 2.8% between 125 and 62.5 μm (very fine sand), 75.6% between 62.5 and 3.9 μm (silt), and 21.2% less than 3.9 μm (clay)).…”
Section: Zeolitic Tuffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to several other recent studies in which this specific chabazitic-zeolitite was used, the total CEC was assumed to be 2.17 meq g −1 (of which 1.46 because of Ca 2+ , 0.60 to K + , 0.07 to Na + and 0.04 to Mg 2+ ) (Ferretti, Keiblinger, et al, 2020, Ferretti et al, 2019Malferrari et al, 2021Malferrari et al, , 2013. The particle size distribution was mainly characterized by silt particles, as demonstrated by X-ray sedimentation analysis (0.4% between 250 and 125 μm (fine sand), 2.8% between 125 and 62.5 μm (very fine sand), 75.6% between 62.5 and 3.9 μm (silt), and 21.2% less than 3.9 μm (clay)).…”
Section: Zeolitic Tuffmentioning
confidence: 99%