2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2007.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tight sufficient condition for Radner–Stiglitz nonconcavity in the value of information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radner and Stiglitz [25] discusses the problem in considerably greater depth, giving general conditions under which the value of information is not concave. This research has been extended more recently by Chade and Schlee [26] and Delara and Gilotte [27] to more general settings.…”
Section: The S-curve Problemmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Radner and Stiglitz [25] discusses the problem in considerably greater depth, giving general conditions under which the value of information is not concave. This research has been extended more recently by Chade and Schlee [26] and Delara and Gilotte [27] to more general settings.…”
Section: The S-curve Problemmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They provide joint conditions on a parameterized family of information structures together with a decision problem such that, when the agent is close to receiving no information at all, the marginal value of information is null. Their result was subsequently generalized in [15] and [16], where are provided joint conditions on parameterized information and a decision problem leading to zero marginal value of information.…”
Section: The Marginal Value Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of marginal value of information is studied in [32,15,16]. They consider parameterized information structures, and derive general conditions on the pair consisting of the information structures and the decision problem under which the marginal value of information close to no information is zero.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonconcavity in the value of information, a notion akin to non-submodularity in a continuous setting, was examined in several papers (Radner & Stiglitz, 1984;Lara & Gilotte, 2007;Chadeand & Schlee, 2001). Submodularity is an important property, because in cases where the VOI is submodular, simple, greedy algorithms result in provably near-optimal policies (Krause & Guestrin, 2009, 2011Papachristoudis & Fisher III, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submodularity is an important property, because in cases where the VOI is submodular, simple, greedy algorithms result in provably near-optimal policies (Krause & Guestrin, 2009, 2011Papachristoudis & Fisher III, 2012). However, the VOI is not submodular in general (Radner & Stiglitz, 1984;Lara & Gilotte, 2007;Chadeand & Schlee, 2001;Krause & Guestrin, 2009), and in particular submodularity does not hold in the selection problem , even in a very limited case involving only two items. Other types of approximate solutions for the batch version of the selection problem exist (Reches, Gal, & Kraus, 2013), with theoretical bounds on the approximation error not based on submodularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%