2022
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A TIGER Among Endoscopic Indices in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 12 , 26 A new scoring system named Toronto inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) global endoscopic reporting score has been introduced lately, which took into account all visualized colorectal segments. 27 , 28 This was beneficial to evaluate endoscopic full disease burden for IBD patients, but further studies were needed to validate the new scoring system, especially on the contribution of stenosis to the index. 28 It seemed that the modified DUBLIN score was practical for physicians due to the easy calculation and the association with disease severity and prognosis, but it was not appropriate to make therapeutic decision relying on a single score alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 12 , 26 A new scoring system named Toronto inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) global endoscopic reporting score has been introduced lately, which took into account all visualized colorectal segments. 27 , 28 This was beneficial to evaluate endoscopic full disease burden for IBD patients, but further studies were needed to validate the new scoring system, especially on the contribution of stenosis to the index. 28 It seemed that the modified DUBLIN score was practical for physicians due to the easy calculation and the association with disease severity and prognosis, but it was not appropriate to make therapeutic decision relying on a single score alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 27 , 28 This was beneficial to evaluate endoscopic full disease burden for IBD patients, but further studies were needed to validate the new scoring system, especially on the contribution of stenosis to the index. 28 It seemed that the modified DUBLIN score was practical for physicians due to the easy calculation and the association with disease severity and prognosis, but it was not appropriate to make therapeutic decision relying on a single score alone. We admitted that comprehensive consideration was needed when the physicians made treatment schedule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%