2013
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A threshold of 10% for myeloperoxidase by flow cytometry is valid to classify acute leukemia of ambiguous and myeloid origin

Abstract: Results: Cell lineage-defining markers and SBB staining were analyzed retrospectively in a cohort of 198 patients who presented with acute leukemia. Eight patients were positive for SBB (>3%), but were considered negative for cMPO (<10%); six patients were negative for SBB ( 3%) and positive for cMPO (!10%) staining. In six patients, we found 10-20% cMPO positive leukemic cells. Five of these cases were SBB positive; the sixth patient showed a clear myeloid phenotype without positivity of any lymphoid marker. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35,36 A threshold of 10% expression has been used by the EGIL group. 3 However, discordant cases are found when both methods are compared, 6,37 leading to the conclusion that the 10% threshold may be conservative but not very sensitive. It should be emphasized that MPO expression can be a difficult test to establish by FCM immunophenotypic analysis since differences in permeabilization reagents and various antibodies have been reported.…”
Section: Mpomentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35,36 A threshold of 10% expression has been used by the EGIL group. 3 However, discordant cases are found when both methods are compared, 6,37 leading to the conclusion that the 10% threshold may be conservative but not very sensitive. It should be emphasized that MPO expression can be a difficult test to establish by FCM immunophenotypic analysis since differences in permeabilization reagents and various antibodies have been reported.…”
Section: Mpomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…MPO stands as the most robust marker that will identify myeloid engagement. Recent publications have redefined the threshold for MPO positivity, 5,6 and yet most MPAL cases with a myeloid component will express MPO broadly in most blasts. An alternative, for MPAL with a strong monocytic differentiation, is represented by (very rare) cases in which blasts will be positive for nonspecific esterase and/or express at least two of the following antigens: CD14, CD11c, CD36, CD64, or cytoplasmic lysozyme.…”
Section: Introduction To Mpalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myeloid origin can be determined with a set of monocytic markers, or more commonly by MPO expression. Although various thresholds for flowbased MPO positivity were introduced over the years (eg, 10% of blast population 1,5 ), no specific threshold has been acknowledged in the 2008 WHO monograph. 3,6 Compared with the EGIL classification, the 2008 WHO classification uses a more limited set of lineage markers that can be more consistently applied.…”
Section: What Is Mixed-phenotype Acute Leukemia?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In our practice, we do not adopt a 10% or higher cutoff of MPO expression by flow cytometry, as suggested in the recent paper mentioned in your letter. 4 Rather, we comprehensively analyze the immunophenotypic deviations in conjunction with MPO expression when determining the extent of myeloid differentiation. In this case, while only 3% of neoplastic blasts express MPO, in conjunction with the other myeloid antigen expression, including CD13, CD15, CD33 and CD117, there is sufficient myeloid differentiation for a diagnosis of MPAL, T/myeloid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%