1992
DOI: 10.1016/0163-1047(92)90248-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A threshold for the protective effect of over-reinforced passive avoidance against scopolamine-induced amnesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher number and intensity of footshocks during the IA training may have led to the occurrence of a ceiling effect on the IA performance. For example, Cruz-Morales et al (1992) found that the amnesic effect triggered by systemic administration of scopolamine, a cholinergic antagonist, was not present when the intensity of footshocks was increased during IA training. Therefore, it is possible that the observed absence of differences between the Ex and SC groups in the present study was due to the occurrence of a ceiling effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher number and intensity of footshocks during the IA training may have led to the occurrence of a ceiling effect on the IA performance. For example, Cruz-Morales et al (1992) found that the amnesic effect triggered by systemic administration of scopolamine, a cholinergic antagonist, was not present when the intensity of footshocks was increased during IA training. Therefore, it is possible that the observed absence of differences between the Ex and SC groups in the present study was due to the occurrence of a ceiling effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As soon as the animal crossed to the aversive compartment with its four paws, the door was closed, the latency to enter was recorded, and the animal received one footshock. Considering that high-intensity shock can suppress scopolamine-induced amnesia in rats [ 17 ], we tested the aversive memory of our animals with two footshock intensities: one group of offspring animals was tested with 0.4 mA for 1 sec (n = 14 for the exercise group and n = 13 for the control group), and a different set of animals was tested with 0.6 mA for 1 sec (n = 15 for both the exercise and control groups). After the shock, the animal was removed from the apparatus and returned to the home cage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although amnestic influences have been rarely studied in experiments using intensive training, the available findings have consistently indicated that amnestic treatments become ineffective or less effective when animals are extensively trained or given relatively high intensities of foot‐shock for training (Prado‐Alcalá et al, ). This effect has been observed after systemic administration of amnestic treatments (Durán‐Arévalo et al, ; Cruz‐Morales et al, ; Solana‐Figueroa et al, ; Díaz‐Trujillo et al, ) as well as localized treatments affecting the striatum (STR), amygdala (AMY), substantia nigra (SN), and hippocampus, among other cerebral structures (Thatcher and Kimble, ; Prado‐Alcalá and Cobos‐Zapiaín, , ; Prado‐Alcalá et al, ; Parent et al, , ; Cobos‐Zapiaín et al, ; Lazaro‐Muñoz et al, ). Such findings have been interpreted as suggesting that the affected structures are not critical sites for the changes mediating associations based on overtraining or strong aversive stimulation, which engages other brain regions subserving memory processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%