2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-stage DEA model to evaluate learning-teaching technical efficiency: Key performance indicators and contextual variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Johnes [98] (p. 281) reports a mean efficiency of 92.51% regarding 130 UK universities with six inputs and three outputs, also with the lowest individual university efficiency levels around 60%. See also the comprehensive review of DEA studies in education by Fuentes, Fuster, and Lillo-Banuls [99] (pp. [91][92][93] regarding the applied inputs and outputs which are highly influential for the calculated efficiency results (in comparison with the number of observed DMU).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Johnes [98] (p. 281) reports a mean efficiency of 92.51% regarding 130 UK universities with six inputs and three outputs, also with the lowest individual university efficiency levels around 60%. See also the comprehensive review of DEA studies in education by Fuentes, Fuster, and Lillo-Banuls [99] (pp. [91][92][93] regarding the applied inputs and outputs which are highly influential for the calculated efficiency results (in comparison with the number of observed DMU).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples are safety of the project site [66][67][68], geographic location of projects [69], environmental impacts [70] and satisfaction of community, client or customer [71,72]. Moreover, the quality and variety of materials and goods used in a project [73,74], number of active labor force and salaries [75][76][77] and experience and scientific levels of employees in the project [78,79] are amongst other effective measures of project performance. Risks and operational risks, in particular, are also important indicators that many researchers have taken into account [23,63,80].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculate MPI by the performance of each DMU at different periods using the technology of a base period. Fare et al (1994) stated that a distance function in input-oriented MPI's approach can effectively measure the productivity change of a given DMUs between time t and t+1 as shown in Equation (2):…”
Section: Malmquist Productivity Index (Mpi) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPI was introduced as a theoretical index by Caves, Christensen, and Diewert (1982) and popularized as an empirical index by Fare, Grosskopf, Norris, and Zhang (1994). We calculate MPI by the performance of each DMU at different periods using the technology of a base period.…”
Section: Malmquist Productivity Index (Mpi) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation