2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-phase XFEM model for hydraulic fracturing with cohesive crack propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When modelling fracture growth, previous studies (Olson and Taleghani 2009;Bunger et al 2012;Wu and Olson 2015;Peirce and Bunger 2015) mostly assume that the fluid leakoff is negligible. The effect of the leakoff on the hydraulic fracturing of a single fracture has been shown in many studies (Carrier and Granet, 2012;Salimzadeh and Khalili, 2015;Salimzadeh et al, 2016). In the present study, the poroelastic effect of the leakoff on the interactions between multiple hydraulic fractures is shown.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When modelling fracture growth, previous studies (Olson and Taleghani 2009;Bunger et al 2012;Wu and Olson 2015;Peirce and Bunger 2015) mostly assume that the fluid leakoff is negligible. The effect of the leakoff on the hydraulic fracturing of a single fracture has been shown in many studies (Carrier and Granet, 2012;Salimzadeh and Khalili, 2015;Salimzadeh et al, 2016). In the present study, the poroelastic effect of the leakoff on the interactions between multiple hydraulic fractures is shown.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 64%
“…To numerically model the hydro-mechanical evolution of fluid-driven fracturing with leakoff, it is essential to couple the fluid flow in the matrix with the mechanical deformation of the rock and the fluid flow inside the fracture (Carrier and Granet 2012;Salimzadeh and Khalili, 2015). Salimzadeh et al (2016) define separate flow models for rock matrix and fractures to capture the hydraulic loadings on the fractures surfaces, as well as the poroelastic deformations of rock matrix on the mesh-independent, finite elementbased framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2D, using an extension of XFEM accounting for poroelasticity, a cohesive zone approach within an XFEM formulation appears to properly reproduce the known solutions for a planestrain propagating hydraulic fracture (Faivre et al, 2016). See also Mohammadnejad and Khoei (2013a,b); Salimzadeh and Khalili (2015) for the fully or partially saturated case but with fewer benchmarks, and Mohammadnejad and Andrade (2016) for the case of fracture closure and re-opening. Extensions to account for frictional joints/fractures have also been proposed by Khoei et al (2015).…”
Section: Extended / Generalized Finite Element Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractures that are more permeable than their host rock can act as preferential (or at least additional) pathways for fluid to flow through the rock, which is relevant in several areas of earth science and engineering, e.g. radioactive waste disposal in crystalline rock, exploitation of fractured hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirs, or hydraulic fracturing (Bonnet et al 2001;Neuman 2005;Salimzadeh and Khalili 2015;Tsang et al 2015). In describing or predicting flow through fractured rock, the effective permeability of the rock, comprising rock matrix and a network of fractures, is a crucial parameter and may depend on several geometric properties of the fractures/networks, such as size, aperture, orientation, and fracture density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%