2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-perspective view of greenhouse gas emission responsibilities in New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, to the extent that constraints on emissions in developing countries are the major impediment to effective international climate policy, allocating responsibility for some portion of these emissions to final consumers elsewhere may represent an opportunity for compromise. Because economic welfare in a region benefits from the production of goods within its territory, there are quantitative approaches aimed at sharing responsibility for emissions among producers and consumers (14,17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, to the extent that constraints on emissions in developing countries are the major impediment to effective international climate policy, allocating responsibility for some portion of these emissions to final consumers elsewhere may represent an opportunity for compromise. Because economic welfare in a region benefits from the production of goods within its territory, there are quantitative approaches aimed at sharing responsibility for emissions among producers and consumers (14,17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a coal mine could be considered to be partially responsible for the emissions caused by the use of the coal. Methods have been developed to share responsibility upstream and downstream along the supply chain while avoiding double counting [34,35] and applied in different applications [33,36].…”
Section: Companiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the consumption principle suggests that the agent must bear its ER according to the upstream environmental effect that is caused by its consumption (Munksgaard and Pedersen, 2001). The consumption principle has been widely used in studies that have audited carbon emissions that are embodied in inter-regional trade (e.g., Wyckoff and Roop, 1994;Shui and Harriss, 2006;Andrew and Forgie, 2008;Tunç et al, 2007;Li and Hewitt, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%