2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Three-Layer Argumentation Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are more limitations addressed in literature [17], these are the most relevant when in comparison to the previously presented Relaxation-based approach. These show that is very unlikely for agents to be able to revise their initial stances, which is the opposite of what the core point of the Relaxation-based approach.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…While there are more limitations addressed in literature [17], these are the most relevant when in comparison to the previously presented Relaxation-based approach. These show that is very unlikely for agents to be able to revise their initial stances, which is the opposite of what the core point of the Relaxation-based approach.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For that we propose the adoption of an argumentbased negotiation approach and the TLAF in particular [5]. The TLAF is a three-layered framework that complements a generic and domain-independent argument-based negotiation process.…”
Section: B the Negotiation Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section describes briefly and informally the Extensible Argumentation Framework (EAF) [1], [7], which is an extension of the Three-Layer Argumentation Framework (TLAF) presented in [8]. The EAF comprehends three modeling layers as depicted in Figure 1.…”
Section: Extensible Argumentation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lack of quantitative or opinion factors) it is envisaged as a suitable approach that agents adopt the generic and domainindependent argument-based negotiation process presented in [1], which relies on the Extensible Argumentation Framework (EAF) [1], [7], to address conflicts about correspondences. For that, the EAF Instantiation phase which concerns the arguments generation is seen as a critical issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%