2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2012.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional self-adaptive hp finite element method for the characterization of waveguide discontinuities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step strategy [15] that performs first an h-adaptive step followed by a p-adaptive one that leads to non-optimal results; (c) the work of Demkowicz et al presented in [3,4,16] and applied in several contexts, e.g. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], that produces almost optimal meshes but needs from solving the problem over a globally refined ( h 2 , p + 1)-grid, which is often prohibitively expensive, and also requires a sophisticated implementation; (d) the work of Houston et al [29], which estimates the regularity of the solution with the Legendre coefficients [30] and, (e) the contribution of Zander et al [31] and applications [32][33][34][35], which combine their multi-level data structure [9, 10] with a classic residual-based estimator [36]. We refer to [30] for a recent (Oct. 2014) review and comparison of some of the existing methods in terms of computational time versus the number of degrees of freedom (dofs).…”
Section: Dirichlet Nodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step strategy [15] that performs first an h-adaptive step followed by a p-adaptive one that leads to non-optimal results; (c) the work of Demkowicz et al presented in [3,4,16] and applied in several contexts, e.g. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], that produces almost optimal meshes but needs from solving the problem over a globally refined ( h 2 , p + 1)-grid, which is often prohibitively expensive, and also requires a sophisticated implementation; (d) the work of Houston et al [29], which estimates the regularity of the solution with the Legendre coefficients [30] and, (e) the contribution of Zander et al [31] and applications [32][33][34][35], which combine their multi-level data structure [9, 10] with a classic residual-based estimator [36]. We refer to [30] for a recent (Oct. 2014) review and comparison of some of the existing methods in terms of computational time versus the number of degrees of freedom (dofs).…”
Section: Dirichlet Nodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D implementation of the hp-adaptivity proposed by the authors (see [9] and the references therein) is based on a selfadaptive strategy devised in [19] and further improved in [15,6]. The hp-adaptive strategy supports anisotropic refinements on irregular meshes with hanging nodes, and isoparametric elements as well as exact-geometry elements.…”
Section: Hp-fem and Automatic Hp-adaptivity In 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous h and p refinements, i.e., local variations of the element size h and the polynomial order of approximation p throughout the mesh are supported (the so called hp-adaptivity [5,6]). Preliminary results of the 3D implementation of the hp-adaptivity proposed by the authors [9] applied to the Petri dish problem were presented in [10], where the cell cultures were modeled as a circular dielectric, i.e., the meniscus shape was not included in the geometry. In this paper, the meniscus shape is included in the computational model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exceptions are the works performed by Schwarzbach et al (2011) and Grayver & Kolev (2015), which demonstrate the advantages of high-order basis functions regarding the needs of degrees of freedom (dof) to satisfy the prior chosen quality criteria in the EM responses. HEFEM have also been shown to be beneficial in other areas of EM wave modeling, such as cavity analysis (Jian-Ming Jin et al 2003;Gomez-Revuelto et al 2012), brain microwave studies (Bonazzoli et al 2018), among others with smooth solutions (Bergot & Duruflé 2013;Olm et al 2019;Eisenträger et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%