2017
DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2017.1336586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional numerical comparison of bearing capacity and settlement of tapered and under-reamed piles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the notations P, PSUR, and PDUR were assigned to represent (1) the pile with a uniform cross-section, (2) the single under-reamed pile and (3) the double under-reamed pile respectively. Following the literature of Prakashi [25] and the provisions mentioned in [10] for the under-reamed pile, a pile with a stem diameter of 0.3 m and a length of 4.5 m was selected [7,28]. The diameter of an under-reamed section was taken as 0.75 m i.e.…”
Section: Materials Properties and Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accordingly, the notations P, PSUR, and PDUR were assigned to represent (1) the pile with a uniform cross-section, (2) the single under-reamed pile and (3) the double under-reamed pile respectively. Following the literature of Prakashi [25] and the provisions mentioned in [10] for the under-reamed pile, a pile with a stem diameter of 0.3 m and a length of 4.5 m was selected [7,28]. The diameter of an under-reamed section was taken as 0.75 m i.e.…”
Section: Materials Properties and Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clay was assumed saturated and under undrained condition (ϕ u = 0) obeying Mohr-Coulomb's failure criterion. Following George and Hari [7] and Vali et al [28], the unit weight (γ), elastic modulus (E) and Poisson ratio (ʋ) of soil were taken as 16 kN/m 3 , 20 MPa and 0.45. The cohesion of soil at the ground surface (c o ) was taken as 15 kPa whereas, with the consideration of linear variation, its magnitude at any given depth was calculated as per the following Eq.…”
Section: Materials Properties and Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As reported by Yu, cavity expansion methods in Geomaterials have been developed since 1950s, and their wide implications lead to the cavity expansion theory as a useful and simple tool for modelling many complex geotechnical problems, including in situ soil testing (eg, Ahmadi and Dariani; Mo et al; Vali et al) and tunnelling (eg, Yang et al; Fang; et al Mo and Yu; Wang et al). Numerous analytical and numerical solutions have been proposed using increasingly sophisticated constitutive soil models by applying the principles of continuum mechanics .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dislocation-based methods initially proposed by Elsworth 31 provided an alternative approximate method to accommodate the fluid pressure dissipation under partially drained conditions, while a pseudo-elastic material was assumed together with an incompressible flow field and a stress-decouple solution was employed to note the influence of soil rigidity to the penetration rate responses. 32 As reported by Yu, 33 cavity expansion methods in Geomaterials have been developed since 1950s, 34,35 and their wide implications lead to the cavity expansion theory as a useful and simple tool for modelling many complex geotechnical problems, including in situ soil testing (eg, Ahmadi and Dariani; 36 Mo et al; 37 Vali et al 38 ) and tunnelling (eg, Yang et al; 39 Fang; et al 40 Mo and Yu; 41 Wang et al 42 ). Numerous analytical and numerical solutions have been proposed using increasingly sophisticated constitutive soil models by applying the principles of continuum mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%