2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional investigation on performance of batter pile groups in laterally spreading ground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may occur even for integration schemes with numerical damping such as the Hilber‐Hughes‐Taylor method 48,49 . The interface between the pile and soil (beams and solids) is therefore modelled using rigid‐link‐constraints (full bonding), connecting each beam node to the corresponding soil nodes such that the pile section in the given beam node acts like a rigid disk 4,50–52 . The macro‐element is thus calibrated using a model without contact elements (for the validation case only).…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may occur even for integration schemes with numerical damping such as the Hilber‐Hughes‐Taylor method 48,49 . The interface between the pile and soil (beams and solids) is therefore modelled using rigid‐link‐constraints (full bonding), connecting each beam node to the corresponding soil nodes such that the pile section in the given beam node acts like a rigid disk 4,50–52 . The macro‐element is thus calibrated using a model without contact elements (for the validation case only).…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48,49 The interface between the pile and soil (beams and solids) is therefore modelled using rigid-link-constraints (full bonding), connecting each beam node to the corresponding soil nodes such that the pile section in the given beam node acts like a rigid disk. 4,[50][51][52] The macroelement is thus calibrated using a model without contact elements (for the validation case only). Due to symmetry, only half of the model is considered in both models.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbonari et al [25] presented an analytical, closed-form solution for dynamic stiffness and kinematic response of single batter piles. Indeed, a few authors have carried out non-linear studies using vertical and batter piles, [26][27][28][29][30] but kinematic interaction of batter pile groups in non-linear soil has yet to be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel to the experimental study, numerical methods have been used to investigate other influential factors on the SPSQ system with lateral displacement, such as internal friction angle, shear modulus, and hydraulic conductivity of soils, the elasticity and material nonlinearity of pile, the combined effect of kinematic load and inertial load, and the effectiveness of different mitigation strategies (Cubrinovski et al, 2008;Tasiopoulou et al, 2013;Tang et al, 2015;Li and Motamed, 2017;Su et al, 2018;Li et al, 2019;Chatterjee et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2022). Particularly, Rajeswari and Sarkar (2021) reported that the vertical ground motion has no additional significant influence on the behavior of inclined pile groups embedded in the gently sloping ground which has been encountered with lateral displacement due to horizontal ground motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%