1986
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(86)90079-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. part II: Computational aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
846
0
38

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,037 publications
(907 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
23
846
0
38
Order By: Relevance
“…With a tip load of 300 N, the solution converges with 5 iterations on average. Table 3 shows the tip displacement of the uncoupled beam compared to results by Simo & Vu-Quoc [16]. And the coupled beam compared to results obtained with the element proposed by Kim et al which was implemented in the co-rotational formulation used in the present study.…”
Section: Pre-bend Cantilevermentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With a tip load of 300 N, the solution converges with 5 iterations on average. Table 3 shows the tip displacement of the uncoupled beam compared to results by Simo & Vu-Quoc [16]. And the coupled beam compared to results obtained with the element proposed by Kim et al which was implemented in the co-rotational formulation used in the present study.…”
Section: Pre-bend Cantilevermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The beam is 2.54 m long, has a height of 16 The cantilever was discretised with 16 elements. In Table 1 the results of the present model are compared with beam models by Hodges et al [9] and Armanios and Badir [11] as well as a finite element shell model by Kim et al [5].…”
Section: Eigenfrequencies Of a Coupled Cantilevermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An L-shaped extensible and shearable rod is attached at both endpoints such that the tangents are able to move freely (moment free support). This example has previously been discussed in the articles [24,32] and all data are taken from there. The length of each leg is 1 2 L = 120 and the stiffness parameters are GA = 16.62 · 10 6 , EA = 43.2 · 10 6 , EI = 14.4 · 10 6 and GJ = 11.08 · 10 6 .…”
Section: Two-dimensional Hinged Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simo and Vu-Quoc [23,24] generalised the approach to the fully three-dimensional dynamic case by introducing quaternions to describe the rotational DoF. The equations are solved using finite elements with displacement and finite rotation coordinates as the independent variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application in mind is for the nonlinear flight dynamics of flexible aircraft [29] and the methodology has been integrated into the framework for Simulation of High-Aspect Ratio Planes (SHARP) [30]. Our starting point will be a geometrically-exact formulation of the beam dynamics, using a displacement-based approach [24,28]. Local beam rotations are parametrised using the CRV with respect to a body-attached reference frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%