A Three Decade Mixed-Method Bibliometric Investigation of the IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Marzi, Giacomo; Caputo, Andrea; Garces, Edwin; Dabić, Marina

doi:10.1109/tem.2018.2870648

Cited by 50 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 1 identifies the inputs and outputs of each of these analytical methods [69]. Next, quantity (production), quality (impact) and relationship [61,70], prolific authors' concentrations according to Lotka's Law [71,72], nucleus journals according to Bradford's Law [73][74][75][76][77][78], and highly cited articles according to the Hirsch index [79][80][81][82][83][84] will be analyzed by scientometry. In another phase, through the VOSviewer [85,86], analysis by co-authors at the level of affiliation with country/region, affiliation with institutions and affiliation with other authors will take place.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis

Bondanini

Giorgi

Ariza-Montes

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to provide a critical review of the scientific research on technostress. As such, global references in this field are identified and highlighted in order to manage pre-existing knowledge and establish future ‘bridges’ among researchers, and to enhance the presently dispersed understanding of this subject. A scientometric meta-analysis of publications on technostress was conducted to achieve this objective. Mainstream journals from the Web of Science (WoS) were used to identify current topics, relevant journals, prolific authors, institutions, and countries, ‘schools of thought’ and the thematic areas around which current technostress debate revolves. In this article a significant contribution comes from the use of the scientific activity itself, together with scientometric meta-analysis techniques and the application of this scientific activity, its impact and relational character, to discover relevant countries, research organizations and authors which can constitute a global reference to demarcate this knowledge frontier, and who lead the ‘critical mass’ of global technostress researchers. This study also distinguishes between the relevant themes studied, with co-keywords plus bibliographic coupling citation, and examines the kind of stress the most prolific authors have considered and, therefore, to discover those topics which should be studied further to deepen this research field, in search of a post-disciplinary knowledge that allows unity of focus in technology and psychology.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis

Bondanini

Giorgi

Ariza-Montes

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our literature review is based on a bibliometric analysis of the bibliometric activity indicators [16] and the visualization of similarities (VOS) [17]. This method has been widely used across multiple study fields, demonstrating its effectiveness in synthesizing and representing high volumes of bibliographic data [15], [18], [19]. We developed a five-step process to explore NPD scientific production and present the results.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, many emerging engineering issues, such as the increasing need for flexibility and the constant pressure for NPD's cost reduction, are heavily impacting on the strategic, marketing, and operational choices made by managers. As a result, on the one hand, an increasing number of management scholars consider today NPD a key element in their studies; on the other hand, engineering management journals are increasingly paying attention to NPD managerial issues [15]. Based on these considerations, along with the absence of a recently available literature review of the field [1]- [3], the present study focuses on the latest developments of the NPD research carried out in the field of business and management from 2008 to 2018.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

New Product Development During the Last Ten Years: The Ongoing Debate and Future Avenues

Marzi

Ciampi

Dalli

et al. 2021

IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.

Self Cite

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on new product development (NPD) has grown considerably over the last 30 years interweaving with serval fields of study such as strategy, marketing, supply chain management, and project management. This study offers an overview of the development of the NPD management literature published over the last ten years (2008 to 2018) in 1,226 peer-reviewed articles. By applying bibliometric analysis, we have discovered the existence of five research clusters focused on the following main thematic areas: the NPD process, the integration of diverse knowledge sources for NPD optimization, the relationship between NPD and corporate strategy, the role of users and consumers in the NPD process, the supplier involvement in the NPD activities. In respect of each area, we selected and reviewed the most relevant contributions and presented the emerging theoretical approaches and best practices. Also, the analysis has helped us to uncover the existence of promising research areas that have been scarcely explored. As a result, we formulated some suggestions for further research to fill in the existing gaps. Managerial Relevance Statement This paper sheds light on the latest developments in the NPD literature. We provide managers and professionals with a selection of the leading research trends, issues, and approaches proposed by scholars and practitioners in the last ten years. For each of the five identified thematic areas, we provide a guide to understanding and interpreting the emerging best practices with a focus on the importance of the cross-functional knowledge integration, the role of market orientation, the relevance of the intertwining between NPD and the company's strategy, and finally the pivotal role of suppliers in creating a superior NPD process' performance. Also, we propose a research agenda for NPD future research composed of a series of wide-spanning research questions. We hope that this agenda can help not only researchers to unpack the proposed questions in specific pieces of research but also practitioners to reflect on the emerging research themes and translate them in new managerial practices.

show abstract

“…First, authors used Bradford's Law at the level of journals to measure the concentration adjustment levels of geometric series order (Bulik, 1978 ; Morse and Leimkuhler, 1979 ; Pontigo and Lancaster, 1986 ; Swokowski, 1988 ; Kumar, 2014 ; Shelton, 2020 ). Looking at the concentration adjustment levels of geometric series order; the authors intended to identify a potential concentration journal hub specialized in entrepreneurial wellbeing (Andrade-Valbuena et al, 2019 ; Marzi et al, 2020 ; Vega-Muñoz et al, 2020 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a scientometric study regarding entrepreneurship and its relationship with wellbeing. The study presents a systematic review and measures impact and relational character to identify the relevance of countries, research organizations, and authors in the field of entrepreneurial wellbeing. The study poses the following research questions: What is the nature of the evolution of scientific knowledge in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What is the nature of the concentration in terms of geographical distribution and co-authorship level of knowledge production in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What are the knowledge trends in knowledge production for entrepreneurial wellbeing literature? The contribution of this research is two-fold. First, in terms of methodology, it contributes study into the use of a more robust approach to search for the scientometric trends about entrepreneurship wellbeing in addition to the PRISMA review tools and the PICOS eligibility criteria. Secondly, the study presents research updates in the search for results for the last 2 years of knowledge production. This upgrade is particularly important in a research field that presents exponential growth, where 2019 and 2020 presented almost double the amount of knowledge production compared to 2017 and 2018.

show abstract

A Three Decade Mixed-Method Bibliometric Investigation of the IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Cited by 50 publications

References 24 publications

Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis

Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis

New Product Development During the Last Ten Years: The Ongoing Debate and Future Avenues

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About