Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429438875-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Thought Experiment on Artistic Research as High-Risk Ethnography 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Se requieren armazones conceptuales que sean accesibles al estudio y análisis del fenómeno artístico. Las aproximaciones fenomenológicas y heurísticas han sido consideradas las aproximaciones que más se ajustan al estudio de los procesos de creación artística (Benchop, 2020;Eisner, 2008;McNiff, 2018). La fenomenología abarca el campo de estudio de las experiencias vividas en un nivel general descriptivo o interpretativo de los fenómenos humanos (Moustakas, 1990;Van Manen, 1984;2017), y la heurística (Douglas & Moustakas, 1985;Moustakas, 1990) se adentra en un análisis profundo InvestIgacIón en creacIón artístIca | Carlos Navarro Moral ARTÍCULOS de la experiencia vivida desde una perspectiva más personal.…”
Section: Fundamentos De Investigación En Creación Artísticaunclassified
“…Se requieren armazones conceptuales que sean accesibles al estudio y análisis del fenómeno artístico. Las aproximaciones fenomenológicas y heurísticas han sido consideradas las aproximaciones que más se ajustan al estudio de los procesos de creación artística (Benchop, 2020;Eisner, 2008;McNiff, 2018). La fenomenología abarca el campo de estudio de las experiencias vividas en un nivel general descriptivo o interpretativo de los fenómenos humanos (Moustakas, 1990;Van Manen, 1984;2017), y la heurística (Douglas & Moustakas, 1985;Moustakas, 1990) se adentra en un análisis profundo InvestIgacIón en creacIón artístIca | Carlos Navarro Moral ARTÍCULOS de la experiencia vivida desde una perspectiva más personal.…”
Section: Fundamentos De Investigación En Creación Artísticaunclassified
“…Building on interventionist, ethnographic, and artistic work in STS, we conceptualise friction as the hidden or implicit tensions that are often part of participatory practices themselves and aim to make these frictions explicit in order to better understand the 'internal inconsistencies within empirical fields' (Downey and Zuiderent-Jerak, 2017, p. 240; also see Zuiderent-Jerak and Jensen, 2007;Benschop, 2019;Borgdorff et al, 2019). Following Ruth Benschop, by analytically focusing on 'friction' we understand the concert as if it were a breaching experiment (Garfinkel, 1967): a practice that allows us to articulate and study the difficulties of innovating participation in symphonic practice (see also Benschop, 2019, p. 54).…”
Section: Empty Minds: Observing Participation In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the audience was invited to challenge traditional concert conventions, in practice many audience members used this freedom to reproduce traditional concert conventions where they could. When we see Empty Minds as a breaching experiment (Garfinkel, 1967;Benschop, 2019) in which conventions, codes, and unspoken rules that enable participants to give meaning to a social situation are breached to demonstrate their workings, we can see that audience members repaired the situation by falling back on concert routines which allowed them to focus on the music itself.…”
Section: Performing For (Un)ruly Audiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By behaving outside of the norm (being extremely polite to your parents), the rules, expectations, and values that structure everyday life become tangible again (1964). Building on Garfinkel's work, Pinch and Bijsterveld argue that it can be useful to study musical innovations as if they were breaching experiments, because these innovations 'reveal underlying norms and values in the musical practices at hand ' (2003: 538; also see Benschop, 2019;Prior, 2018). In other words, because innovations might disturb the routinised ways of working in a practice, they allow us to see anew what conventions, routines, and norms entail.…”
Section: The Curious Case Of Innovating Symphonic Concertsmentioning
confidence: 99%