Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence 1981
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-208820-9.50024-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Thermodynamic Explanation for the Kinetic Differences Observed Using Different Chain Length Aldehydes in the in Vitro Bacterial Bioluminescent Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviation of bioluminescence decay from first-order kinetics has been noted previously (Becvar and Wu, 1981;Lee and Murphy, 1975;Matheson and Lee, 1983;Shannon et al, 1978). The complex triphasic bioluminescence decay kinetics observed by Matheson and Lee (1983) at 2°C in the presence of tetradecanal as the substrate is interpreted in terms of an energy transfer scheme, where the decomposition of two distinct chemically energized species causes electronic excitation of either of two different fluorescent molecules which function as light emitters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The deviation of bioluminescence decay from first-order kinetics has been noted previously (Becvar and Wu, 1981;Lee and Murphy, 1975;Matheson and Lee, 1983;Shannon et al, 1978). The complex triphasic bioluminescence decay kinetics observed by Matheson and Lee (1983) at 2°C in the presence of tetradecanal as the substrate is interpreted in terms of an energy transfer scheme, where the decomposition of two distinct chemically energized species causes electronic excitation of either of two different fluorescent molecules which function as light emitters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%