1978
DOI: 10.1042/bj1760967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A thermodynamic analysis of the interaction between the mitochondrial coupling adenosine triphosphatase and its naturally occurring inhibitor protein

Abstract: 1. The naturally occurring ATPase (adenosine triphosphatase)-inhibitor protein, from bovine heart mitochondria, was obtained as a single pure protein. It was not identical with any of the five subunits (alpha-epsilon) of the isolated ATPase, and appeared to be a single polypeptide chain. 2. The inhibitor combined with the ATPase in a 1:1 molar ratio, producing a completely inhibited ATPase molecule. The affinity of the ATPase for its inhibitor is high; the K(d) is of the order of 10(-8)m. 3. The enthalpy of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
29
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ATP dependence of k+l (which is proportional to the 1/C5o value) exhibits a complex pattern ( fig.3) and, at first glance, contradicts the assumption [21][22][23] that some catalytic intermediate of the enzyme is a target for the action of IP. Thus, Panchenko and Vinogradov [24] observed that the rate of IP-induced inactivation of F, was half-saturated at about 5/zM ATP and remained unchanged over the ATP concentration range 0.02-1.0 mM, while F1-ATPase activity was shown to have a Km for ATP of -0.1 mM [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ATP dependence of k+l (which is proportional to the 1/C5o value) exhibits a complex pattern ( fig.3) and, at first glance, contradicts the assumption [21][22][23] that some catalytic intermediate of the enzyme is a target for the action of IP. Thus, Panchenko and Vinogradov [24] observed that the rate of IP-induced inactivation of F, was half-saturated at about 5/zM ATP and remained unchanged over the ATP concentration range 0.02-1.0 mM, while F1-ATPase activity was shown to have a Km for ATP of -0.1 mM [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The latter result is in contradiction with the data of Chernyak et al [19] and means that, at least in the case of the active acidic form of IP, Zn 2÷ (and, possibly, Cd 2÷) does not affect the interaction of F1 and IP. The rate of association of IP and F1 was reported to decrease with increasing ionic strength [21]. Since the preincubation medium is of high ionic strength (see section 2), an increase in ionic strength due to a rise in MgATP concentration appears unlikely to be the cause of the decrease in k+~ observed at high ATP concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…la, compare traces d-e to trace a). It has been known that the rate of FoF~ ATPase deactivation depends on the enzyme turnover (mitochondrial enzyme [26,27], CFoCF ~ [12]). Since the TTX-modified CFoCF ~ hydrolyses ATP 5-6 times slower than the native form, this could explain why the TTX-modified enzyme does not deactivate after ApH+ collapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its activity, in both synthetic and hydrolytic directions, is inhibited by a naturally occurring, intramitochondrial peptide, IF~ [1], inhibition being complete at 1 mol IF~/mol F1 [2]. Since IF1 is present in a 1 : 1 molar ratio with F1 in bovine heart mitochondria [3], it seems likely that a considerable proportion of F1 exists complexed with IF~ in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like many regulatory peptides (calmodulin [6], troponin C [7], various peptide hormones [8]), IF1 can assume a highly helical configuration with a superficial hydrophobic patch (an 'amphiphilic helix') [9]. Thermodynamic analysis [2] and differential labelling studies [10] have allowed us to identify the binding site for F1 as the hydrophobic patch on this amphiphilic helix. The binding site for IF1 on F1, however, is less well defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%