1956
DOI: 10.1038/1781308a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theory of Word-Frequency Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9) sketched a simple vocabulary growth model. Parker-Rhodes and Joyce (1956) argued that the distribution arises by a linear search through words in long-term memory ordered by frequency during normal language processing, where the time required to scan a word is proportional to the number of words scanned. To date, there is no evidence for this kind of process in normal language use.…”
Section: Models Of Zipf’s Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9) sketched a simple vocabulary growth model. Parker-Rhodes and Joyce (1956) argued that the distribution arises by a linear search through words in long-term memory ordered by frequency during normal language processing, where the time required to scan a word is proportional to the number of words scanned. To date, there is no evidence for this kind of process in normal language use.…”
Section: Models Of Zipf’s Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To give a brief picture of the range of explanations that have been worked out, such distributions have been argued to arise from random concatenative processes (Conrad & Mitzenmacher, 2004; Li, 1992; Miller, 1957), mixtures of exponential distributions (Farmer & Geanakoplos, 2006), scale-invariance (Chater & Brown, 1999), (bounded) optimization of entropy (Mandelbrot, 1953) or Fisher information (Hernando, Puigdomènech, Villuendas, Vesperinas & Plastino, 2009), the invariance of such power laws under aggregation (see Farmer & Geanakoplos, 2006), multiplicative stochastic processes (see Mitzenmacher, 2004), preferential reuse (Simon, 1955; Yule, 1944), symbolic descriptions of complex stochastic systems (Corominas-Murtra & Solé, 2010), random walks on logarithmic scales (Kawamura & Hatano, 2002), semantic organization (Guiraud, 1968; D. Manin, 2008), communicative optimization (Ferrer i Cancho, 2005a, b; Ferrer i Cancho & Solé, 2003; Mandelbrot, 1962; Salge, Ay, Polani, & Prokopenko, 2013; Zipf, 1936, 1949), random division of elements into groups (Baek, Bernhardsson & Minnhagen 2011), first- and second-order approximation of most common (e.g., normal) distributions (Belevitch, 1959), and optimized memory search (Parker-Rhodes & Joyce, 1956), among many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rank-frequency of words in natural language follows a family of power law distributions; such distributions are known as Zipf's law (Zipf, 1936(Zipf, , 1949). Zipf's law has been receiving tremendous attentions in statistical/quantitative linguistics for more than 70 years (Zipf, 1936(Zipf, , 1949Parker-Rhodes and Joyce, 1956;Simon, 1955Simon, , 1960Mandelbrot, 1953Mandelbrot, , 1961Carroll, 1967;Chen, 1991;Li, 1992Li, , 2002Corominas-Murtra and Solé, 2010;Piantadosi, 2014). While these research narrow the power law distributions in the words' rank-frequency, we discover that the power law distributions also appear in another form of natural language: entity length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After completing the original qualitative data coding, to answer the second research question, we used the frequency statistics method to analyze the frequency of support needs of college student entrepreneurs ( Parker-Rhodes and Joyce, 1956 ). The frequency analysis method is commonly used to evaluate the importance of research objects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the students' ranking of the importance of the support needs during the different entrepreneurial stages, we conducted further frequency analysis on the distribution (Parker-Rhodes and Joyce, 1956). The results are shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Distribution Of Support Needs Across the Entrepreneurial Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%