1952
DOI: 10.1037/h0057334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theory of threat and defense.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reciprocal relationship between threat and self-esteem, previously described by Hogan (1952), is also deserving of comment. As already indicated, there is some evidence to substantiate this concept.…”
Section: Self-estimates In Relation To Adjustment Rating and Threatmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reciprocal relationship between threat and self-esteem, previously described by Hogan (1952), is also deserving of comment. As already indicated, there is some evidence to substantiate this concept.…”
Section: Self-estimates In Relation To Adjustment Rating and Threatmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For them, feelings of selfadequacy are created by an absence of experiences inconsistent with the structure of self. Hogan (1952) elaborated upon Rogers' notion of threat by pointing out "when threat is spoken of, what is meant is threat to a related concept or value. "…”
Section: Concept Of Threatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is evidence that individuals desire feedback for self-evaluative processes (Festinger, 1954), particularly feedback which is consonant with their benefits and self-images (Adams, 1961;Ehrlich, Guttman, Schb'nbach, & Mills, 1957;Mills, Aronson, & Robinson, 1959). Under conditions of stress individuals may distort or deny feedback inconsistent with their self-image (Hogan, 1952;Hunt & Schroder, 1958;Goldstein, 1959;Schroder & Hunt, 1957). It also has been demonstrated that knowledge of results, that is, feedback, can be detrimental to the performance of the highly anxious person (Mandler & Sarason, 1952).…”
Section: University Of Wisconsinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defense is conceived as a response to a threat whereby the individual maintains a sense of a secure self by denying or distorting the threatening experience [24]. A defensive reaction does not resolve the threat [26]; the threat may still be present, although it may be denied or distorted (usually minimized). Haan [27] felt that coping mechanisms are healthy while defense mechanisms reflect inadequate or pathological ways of dealing with a threat.…”
Section: Forest Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%