1967
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-196707000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theory of the Nuclear Densimeter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2D; r = -0.61; significant at .01 level of probability). Taylor and Kansara (1967) attribute this inverse relationship to greater scattering and absorption of the gamma photons as the soil density increases. Since soil moisture increases the occurrence of photon slowing, each reading was corrected for soil moisture.…”
Section: Gamma Ray Scattering Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D; r = -0.61; significant at .01 level of probability). Taylor and Kansara (1967) attribute this inverse relationship to greater scattering and absorption of the gamma photons as the soil density increases. Since soil moisture increases the occurrence of photon slowing, each reading was corrected for soil moisture.…”
Section: Gamma Ray Scattering Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scatter gauges for density and thickness measurements are also widely used, usually relying on photon Compton scattering, the energy-angle relationship for this process, and the dependence of this process on electron density in the sample, as discussed by Taylor and Kansara [ 25 , 26 ], Pandey [ 27 ], Gayer et al [ 28 ], and Zabrodskii [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Although the detector, which may be either on the same or far side of the sample from the radiation source, is usually collimated to restrict the detector view, in some monitoring devices neither the source nor the detector is collimated.…”
Section: General Principles Of Radiometric Gauging and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two opposing factors balance to some extent. Taylor and Kansara (1967) have shown that the effect of change of K, on I is greater than the effect of chan e of k, and so there is a residual sufficiently large to be of any practical application. Z/A ratio) and to decrease, because exp(-f ,pd) decreases with the effect due to the k,-factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%