A Theory of Predictive Dissonance: Predictive Processing Presents a New Take on Cognitive Dissonance

Abstract

This article is a comparative study between predictive processing (PP, or predictive coding) and cognitive dissonance (CD) theory. The theory of CD, one of the most influential and extensively studied theories in social psychology, is shown to be highly compatible with recent developments in PP. This is particularly evident in the notion that both theories deal with strategies to reduce perceived error signals. However, reasons exist to update the theory of CD to one of “predictive dissonance.” First, the hierarchical PP framework can be helpful in understanding varying nested levels of CD. If dissonance arises from a cascade of downstream and lateral predictions and consequent prediction errors, dissonance can exist at a multitude of scales, all the way up from sensory perception to higher order cognitions. This helps understand the previously problematic dichotomy between “dissonant cognitive relations” and “dissonant psychological states,” which are part of the same perception-action process while still hierarchically distinct. Second, since PP is action-oriented, it can be read to support recent action-based models of CD. Third, PP can potentially help us understand the recently speculated evolutionary origins of CD. Here, the argument is that responses to CD can instill meta-learning which serves to prevent the overfitting of generative models to ephemeral local conditions. This can increase action-oriented ecological rationality and enhanced capabilities to interact with a rich landscape of affordances. The downside is that in today’s world where social institutions such as science a priori separate noise from signal, some reactions to predictive dissonance might propagate ecologically unsound (underfitted, confirmation-biased) mental models such as climate denialism.

Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making

“…We would rather say that no choice commitment is made until internal value representation refinements allow choice confidence to reach a satisfying (non-aversive) level. This idea is a simple extension of the so-called Action- (Kaaronen, 2018). That cognitive dissonance reduction occurs during the decision process (and not after) is critical, however, because it is now endowed with a clear functional purpose (namely: improving decision accuracy).…”

Cultural Evolution of Sustainable Behaviors: Pro-environmental Tipping Points in an Agent-Based Model

“…For instance, research in cognitive dissonance theory illustrates how through processes of selfjustification, we have a tendency to adjust our attitudes and beliefs to conform with our current, past, or recent behavior. 5,40,68 More recent approaches to cognitive science, such as predictive processing, also support the notion that we have a tendency to adjust our internal models of the world to minimize prediction error or to keep our internal models of the world in tune with our past and current behavior. 68,69 If these internal states are predictors of behavior B (see Personal States Affect Behavior), this would also imply (all other things being equal, and on average) that behavior B would increase the future probability of behaving in that way.…”

Tracking the Influence of Predictive Cues on the Evaluation of Food Images: Volatility Enables Nudging

“…Importantly, the literature on expectation violations appears to imply conflicting views on how the size of the violation might affect subsequent evaluative processing. According to a theory of predictive dissonance (Kaaronen, 2018), the processing following expectation violations can be compared with the active efforts toward the reduction of cognitive dissonance (Festinger, 1957). Stronger efforts would be required with greater magnitude of dissonance.…”