Medienbildung in Neuen Kulturräumen 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92133-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
146
0
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
146
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…As participants interact with their mobile apps and friends or teachers to practice the target languages, they reveal agency, structures and cultural practices in this socio-cultural ecology of learning (Pachler et al, 2010, Sharples et al, 2007. Learning languages using mobile apps in this study are at second or third language acquisition levels and mobile technologies enable interaction to be collected, archived, re-examined and edited, thus enabling reflection and interaction (Warschauer, 1997;Lin, 2014).…”
Section: Discussion: the Nature Of Language Learning Using Smartphonesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As participants interact with their mobile apps and friends or teachers to practice the target languages, they reveal agency, structures and cultural practices in this socio-cultural ecology of learning (Pachler et al, 2010, Sharples et al, 2007. Learning languages using mobile apps in this study are at second or third language acquisition levels and mobile technologies enable interaction to be collected, archived, re-examined and edited, thus enabling reflection and interaction (Warschauer, 1997;Lin, 2014).…”
Section: Discussion: the Nature Of Language Learning Using Smartphonesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The use of such technologies in education has however, been more gradual as educators contend with how understanding and application of these tools and devices in their classrooms could be more effectively used to support different types of learning (Crook, 2012;Jones et al, 2014;Sung et al, 2015). While mobile learning (m-learning) has been depicted as having the affordances of immediacy, permanency, interactivity, and accessibility (Ogata and Yano 2005), more recent definitions have moved from a predominantly technocentric focus to an increasing emphasis on the mobility of the learner and learner agency (Kukulska-Hulme and Shield, 2008;Sharples et al, 2007). m-learning is defined by Sharples et al (2007, p. 225) as 'the processes of coming to know through conversations across multiple contexts.…”
Section: Literature Review: Mobile Assisted Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is a constant yearning for a conceptual framework for mobile learning applications that will provide systematic support for mobile lifelong learning (Murthy, 2008;Sharples, Taylor, & Vavoula, 2010). Such a framework encompasses four perspectives: (1) generic mobile environment issues, (2) learning contexts, (3) learning experiences, and (4) learning objectives (Murthy, 2008).…”
Section: Perspectives On Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to understand to into ITC-ILO staff develo framework [9] for analysing dialectical relationship betw elements:…”
Section: Fig 2 To Measure Mobile Be Work-related Tasks and Enco Devmentioning
confidence: 99%