2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.1879832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical study of the gas-phase chemi-ionization reaction between uranium and oxygen atoms

Abstract: The U + O chemi-ionization reaction has been investigated by quantum chemical methods. Potential-energy curves have been calculated for several electronic states of UO and UO + .Comparison with the available spectroscopic and thermodynamic values for these species is reported and a mechanism for the chemi-ionization reaction U + O → UO + + e − is proposed. The U + O and Sm+ O chemi-ionization reactions are the first two metal-plus-oxidant chemi-ionization reactions to be studied theoretically in this way.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
42
3
Order By: Relevance
“…16 There have been several theoretical calculations of the IE for UO, the most recent being the CASSCF-configuration interaction calculation of Tyagi, 6 where the spin-orbit operator was included from the outset ͑IE= 5.59 eV͒ and the CASSCF-SOC calculations of Paulovič et al, 2 where spin-free calculations preceded evaluation of the terms associated with the spin-orbit operator ͑IE= 6.05 eV͒. 16 There have been several theoretical calculations of the IE for UO, the most recent being the CASSCF-configuration interaction calculation of Tyagi, 6 where the spin-orbit operator was included from the outset ͑IE= 5.59 eV͒ and the CASSCF-SOC calculations of Paulovič et al, 2 where spin-free calculations preceded evaluation of the terms associated with the spin-orbit operator ͑IE= 6.05 eV͒.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 There have been several theoretical calculations of the IE for UO, the most recent being the CASSCF-configuration interaction calculation of Tyagi, 6 where the spin-orbit operator was included from the outset ͑IE= 5.59 eV͒ and the CASSCF-SOC calculations of Paulovič et al, 2 where spin-free calculations preceded evaluation of the terms associated with the spin-orbit operator ͑IE= 6.05 eV͒. 16 There have been several theoretical calculations of the IE for UO, the most recent being the CASSCF-configuration interaction calculation of Tyagi, 6 where the spin-orbit operator was included from the outset ͑IE= 5.59 eV͒ and the CASSCF-SOC calculations of Paulovič et al, 2 where spin-free calculations preceded evaluation of the terms associated with the spin-orbit operator ͑IE= 6.05 eV͒.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5,6 In order to make comparisons with these results we make the assumption that the experimental value for the equilibrium bond length can be approximated from the expression 2,5,6 In order to make comparisons with these results we make the assumption that the experimental value for the equilibrium bond length can be approximated from the expression …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon ionization the electron is removed from a 7s shell, and as a consequence the SO effect on IE1 is only about 0.01 eV. This molecule was studied at the CASPT2 level of theory by Paulovic et al, 57 who reported a IE1 value of 6.05 eV, in agreement with the experimental value measured by Goncharov et al, 58 6.0313 ( 0.0006 eV. Paulovic et al 57 did not report a value for IE2, which we now report in this study.…”
Section: 731mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reaction 5 followed by reaction 6 has already been demonstrated as the source of the chemielectron band observed in a study of the U + O 2 chemiionization reaction. 8,9 In the experimental study of lanthanum with the oxidants O 2 (X 3 Σ g ), O 2 (a 1 ∆ g ) and O( 3 P), 6,7 the La + O 2 (X 3 Σ g ) reaction gave a chemielectron band with a most probable kinetic energy (MPKE) (band maximum) of 1.03 ( 0.20 eV and a high kinetic energy offset (HKEO) of 1.5 ( 0.1 eV. For the La + O 2 (a 1 ∆ g ) reaction, these values were 2.41 ( 0.06 and 3.3 ( 0.1 eV, whereas for the La + O( 3 P) reaction they were 0.67 ( 0.06 and 1.8 ( 0.1 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%