2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2011.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical study of the structure and electron density of the peptide bond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this database, all structures were obtained via basin-hopping global optimization , performed with a nonreactive force field, followed by a local optimization with the PBE functional including a TS dispersion correction for a numerical atom-centered orbital basis set . For the comparison of reaction energies and the subsequent investigation of pathways for condensation reactions, the dipeptide structures from Saada and Pearson were geometry-optimized using Gaussian09 at the B3LYP/6-311+G­(d,p) level of theory with a D2 dispersion correction and a tight root-mean-square gradient (RMSG) convergence criterion of 10 –5 Hartree Å –1 . We will refer to these DFT calculations as the QM results below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this database, all structures were obtained via basin-hopping global optimization , performed with a nonreactive force field, followed by a local optimization with the PBE functional including a TS dispersion correction for a numerical atom-centered orbital basis set . For the comparison of reaction energies and the subsequent investigation of pathways for condensation reactions, the dipeptide structures from Saada and Pearson were geometry-optimized using Gaussian09 at the B3LYP/6-311+G­(d,p) level of theory with a D2 dispersion correction and a tight root-mean-square gradient (RMSG) convergence criterion of 10 –5 Hartree Å –1 . We will refer to these DFT calculations as the QM results below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry of the simulated complexes was optimized at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) computational level using Gaussian 09 suite of programs [33]. The B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p) methodology was used to locate the stationary points along the potential energy surface because it is a cost-effective method and has widely been applied to H-bonded complexes as model systems [34][35][36][37][38][39]. The basis set superposition error (BSSE) was calculated by the counterpoise method of Boys and Bernardi [40].…”
Section: Computational Details and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applications of FMO to polypeptides, CαÀ C bonds [26] are almost always used as fragment boundaries, instead of peptide CÀ N bonds, [31,32] leading to fragments being shifted from conventional residues by a CO group, which can obfuscate analyses detailing the role of residues in molecular recognition studies. Two solutions have been proposed to the shifted residue problem, (1) a compensation [33] for the poor accuracy of the CÀ N detachment by the third-order expansion FMO3 and (2) a repartitioning of properties 34 developed for density-functional tight-binding (DFTB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%