2011
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical study of CO adsorption on gold by Hückel theory and density functional theory calculations

Abstract: It is crucial to understand the nature of CO adsorption on gold so as to elucidate the mechanism of low-temperature CO oxidation on nanogold catalysts. We performed theoretical analysis of CO adsorption on gold by using Hückel theory and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Hückel theory indicates that CO adsorption on gold is dominated by the electron distribution at the Au atom, which is greatly affected by neighboring Au atoms, coadsorbed or doping species. The increase of σ-bonding electrons shoul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the smaller coordination number of gold atoms on the stepped Au(321) surface compared to those on Au (111) and Au(100) surfaces should induce the stronger Au-O bond, namely, higher reactivity. The property of less coordinated gold atoms with higher activity is consistent with that found in CO adsorption on gold [27]. Furthermore, this implies the possibility that neighboring gold atoms may hinder the reactivity of gold on (111) and (100) Figure 1g) is stronger than that on the Au(111) surface (Figure 1h).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This implies that the smaller coordination number of gold atoms on the stepped Au(321) surface compared to those on Au (111) and Au(100) surfaces should induce the stronger Au-O bond, namely, higher reactivity. The property of less coordinated gold atoms with higher activity is consistent with that found in CO adsorption on gold [27]. Furthermore, this implies the possibility that neighboring gold atoms may hinder the reactivity of gold on (111) and (100) Figure 1g) is stronger than that on the Au(111) surface (Figure 1h).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…More importantly, the atomic structure at the perimeter interface, the most probable reaction sites of the catalysts, is not structurally rigid. Ab-initio analyses by Sun et al have suggested possible models for the dissociation of oxygen molecules at the perimeter interface in some accordance with Cscorrected ETEM observations [73][74][75][76].…”
Section: Reaction Sitesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The CO 2π* ← Au 5d back-donation is less affected by the charge on Au, and therefore, its contribution to the overall interaction between CO and Au along with electrostatic effects makes the interaction attractive. (Some authors argued that for CO adsorbed on Au surfaces CO 5σ → Au σ bonding should be more important than CO 2π* ← Au 5d back-donation when CO adsorbs on top of a surface Au atom; , however, these two contributions are difficult to separate, and it seems that for CO bound to partially negatively charged Au the π back-donation from Au to CO and electrostatic interactions may become the main bonding components). This unfavorable (in view of the weakened donation part) CO-bonding situation triggers the discussed structural rearrangement, i.e., the extraction of the Au atom interacting with CO out of the Au(111) terrace and the formation of a stable Au–CO carbonyl moiety in which the Au atom becomes slightly positively charged (+0.11 e ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%