2017
DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical NMR study of selected benzazoles: Comparison of GIPAW and GIAO‐PCM (DMSO) calculations

Abstract: This paper compares the absolute shieldings obtained by gauge-including-projected-augmented-wave (GIPAW) to those obtained by gauge-invariant atomic orbital/Becke, 3-parameter, Lee-Yang-Parr (GIAO/B3LYP)/6-311++G(d,p)-polarizable continuum model (PCM, dimethyl sulfoxide) for nine benzazoles (benzimidazoles, indazoles, and benzotriazoles) recorded in the solid-state. Three nuclei were explored, C, N, and F, and the gauge-including-projected-augmented-wave approach only proved better for N MAS NMR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 N‐ and 13 C‐NMR parameters were computed by using the CASTEP package. The calculated absolute shieldings ( σ ) were transformed to the corresponding chemical shifts ( δ , ppm) by using the Equations and . These values were compared with those experimentally reported previously, if they are available and with those determined in the present work for 2 and 2′ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…15 N‐ and 13 C‐NMR parameters were computed by using the CASTEP package. The calculated absolute shieldings ( σ ) were transformed to the corresponding chemical shifts ( δ , ppm) by using the Equations and . These values were compared with those experimentally reported previously, if they are available and with those determined in the present work for 2 and 2′ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Then, following our conclusion that, in some cases, CASTEP was not much better than GIAO if all the hydrogen atoms were optimized keeping all the non‐hydrogen atoms in the positions determined by X‐ray crystallography, we calculated the 2 and 2′ trimers at the GIAO/B3LYP/6‐311++G(d,p) level. Excluding the C4‐Br signal, the results are the following: δ13Cexp0.25embold2=()162±1()0.62±0.040.25emσGIAO13Ccalc0.25embold2;n=24;R2=0.911,MAE=1.20.25emppm δ13Cexp0.25em2=()156±3()0.51±0.060.25emσGIAO13Ccalc0.25em2';n=24;R2=0.781,MAE=1.70.25emppm …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, chemical shifts for crystal structure INDRUB were simulated by using the GIPAW approach. Computed absolute shielding values were transformed into chemical shifts, according to linear equations established previously for the azole‐family compounds in solid state, and reported in Table as solid state (SS, see below). The comparison of experimental CPMAS values with these calculated ones provided a linear equation with an R 2 of 1.000 (Equation ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%