1981
DOI: 10.1029/wr017i001p00065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical analysis of interflow of water through surface soil horizons with implications for movement of chemicals in field runoff

Abstract: Steady interflow of water in the near-surface saturated soil horizons, which are the important nonpoint sources of applied agricultural chemicals appearing in field runoff, is investigated theoretically. Analytical solutions are obtained for some relevant cases of interflow in a sloping layered soil having a subsoil of lower permeability. Analysis is made for the effect of the relative permeability of the subsoil and of the depth of the subsoil above an impermeable base varying from zero to infinity, in relati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an unsaturated soil, the ponding–runoff layer is not a fixed initial condition but a process that is dependent on rainfall and infiltration. Similar to the assumptions made by Ahuja et al (1981b) and Govindaraju et al (1996), chemicals in the soil mixing layer are the only sources of chemical constituents in infiltration and runoff water, and the chemicals are considered to transfer only vertically. The chemicals in the soil mixing zone could move into the underlying soil through the interface between them and the infiltrated water.…”
Section: Mathematical Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In an unsaturated soil, the ponding–runoff layer is not a fixed initial condition but a process that is dependent on rainfall and infiltration. Similar to the assumptions made by Ahuja et al (1981b) and Govindaraju et al (1996), chemicals in the soil mixing layer are the only sources of chemical constituents in infiltration and runoff water, and the chemicals are considered to transfer only vertically. The chemicals in the soil mixing zone could move into the underlying soil through the interface between them and the infiltrated water.…”
Section: Mathematical Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Obviously the limits of these one‐dimensional simplifications are reached as soon as the soil is water saturated or the imposed water flux exceeds the saturated hydraulic conductivity. In both cases, the water content cannot be adjusted anymore and lateral water flux at the soil surface or at the surface of some impeding soil layer, also termed interflow (Ahuja et al, 1981), becomes dominant. Hence, we are back to a challenging three‐dimensional problem with additional structural heterogeneities to be considered including micro‐ and macrotopography of the soil surface and of impeding soil layers below ground as well as the horizontal connectivity of different soil types in the landscape.…”
Section: Scales and Scale Transitions Of Water Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original presentation of the problem by KSW used unnecessarily complicated notation and included an unnecessary quadratic term. But KSW did provide a basis for later work, such as that by Ahuja [1981] and Ahuja and Ross [1982,1983].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The missing cash term is on the list. It is also apparent that Ahuja et al [1981] included the denominator cash.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%