2009
DOI: 10.3103/s1066369x09070081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theorem on strongly η-representable sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sets, we derive (0 , 0 ). Below we need PROPOSITION 3.7 [14]. Let f : Q × ω −→ ω satisfy the following conditions: (1) for any q ∈ Q, there is a finite limit lim s→∞ f (q, s);…”
Section: A Turing Degree Is Called Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sets, we derive (0 , 0 ). Below we need PROPOSITION 3.7 [14]. Let f : Q × ω −→ ω satisfy the following conditions: (1) for any q ∈ Q, there is a finite limit lim s→∞ f (q, s);…”
Section: A Turing Degree Is Called Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. The idea, just as in the proof that every ∆ 0 2 degree contains a limitwise monotonic set on ω (see [5] and [13]), is to show that S ⊕ ω is a support increasing limitwise monotonic set on Q for any S in a ∆ 0 2 degree. Towards this end, fix a ∆ 0 2 degree d, a set S ∈ d, and a ∆ 0 2 approximation {S s } s∈ω to S with S 0 = ∅ and |S s | < ∞ for all s.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Rosenstein [16] and Fellner [4] coded any -set and -set, correspondingly, into a computable strong -representation. This result was improved by Zubkov [21]: if A is and B is then is strongly -representable. Thus, there is a “gap” between the upper and lower bounds of the levels of the arithmetic hierarchy of sets that have computable -representations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%