2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Text Semantic Similarity Approach for Arabic Paraphrase Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Madnani and Dorr (2010) pointed out, paraphrases may occur at different levels, such as word-level, phrase-level, and sentence-level. Although there has been some work that concerned the identification of lexical and phrasal paraphrases (Ganitkevitch et al, 2013;Pavlick et al, 2015), most recent work on paraphrase identification has been performed at the sentence level, and has involved determining whether a given sentence pair is a paraphrase or not in a classification setup (Dolan and Brockett, 2005;Fernando and Stevenson, 2008;Xu et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2019b;Liu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Madnani and Dorr (2010) pointed out, paraphrases may occur at different levels, such as word-level, phrase-level, and sentence-level. Although there has been some work that concerned the identification of lexical and phrasal paraphrases (Ganitkevitch et al, 2013;Pavlick et al, 2015), most recent work on paraphrase identification has been performed at the sentence level, and has involved determining whether a given sentence pair is a paraphrase or not in a classification setup (Dolan and Brockett, 2005;Fernando and Stevenson, 2008;Xu et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2019b;Liu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to PI, there exist a wide range of traditional approaches that are relatively effective for the task: (1) lexical overlap features such as n-gram overlap (Wan et al 2006) and machine translation evaluation metrics (Madnani, Tetreault, and Chodorow 2012); (2) using external lexical knowledge like WordNet (Fellbaum, 1998;Fernando and Stevenson 2008); (3) modeling divergence of dependency syntax between two sentences (Das and Smith 2009); (4) distributional models with matrix factorization (Guo and Diab 2012;Ji and Eisenstein 2013). The traditional approaches mainly consist of unsupervised methods and feature engineering.…”
Section: Technical Background and Research Goalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods such as Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), word2vec, Global Vector Representation (GloVe), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) were experimented for paraphrase detection. Another group of researchers [10] used a deep learning based method to detect Arabic paraphrasing. This method consists of pre-processing phase, and word2vec phase.…”
Section: A Similarity Checking Work In Foreign Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%