2018
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test Utilization Approach to the Diagnostic Workup of Isolated Eosinophilia in Otherwise Morphologically Unremarkable Bone Marrow

Abstract: Findings from our institutional experience support initial testing in isolated eosinophilia with otherwise unremarkable BM to include PDGFRA rearrangement, tryptase/CD25 immunohistochemistry, cytogenetics, and T-cell flow cytometry/receptor gene rearrangement. This approach achieves diagnostic quality and test utilization efficiency in our clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These cases accounted for 9% (7/77) of patients with HES in whom neither a reactive nor neoplastic cause was identified after an extensive workup (Hu et al, 2018). Reported incidences of L‐HES among patients with eosinophilia vary (Fang et al, 2018; Shi et al, 2019), depending on the patient populations screened. Seven of these patients had clinical symptoms and signs related to an eosinophilic infiltrate or eosinophil activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cases accounted for 9% (7/77) of patients with HES in whom neither a reactive nor neoplastic cause was identified after an extensive workup (Hu et al, 2018). Reported incidences of L‐HES among patients with eosinophilia vary (Fang et al, 2018; Shi et al, 2019), depending on the patient populations screened. Seven of these patients had clinical symptoms and signs related to an eosinophilic infiltrate or eosinophil activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Department of Pathology, Ambroise Pare Hospital, AP-HP and Versailles SQY University, Boulogne, France. 22 Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 23 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg and Department of Clinical Chemistry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several changes to the diagnostic criteria of CEL are introduced: (1) the time interval required to define sustained hypereosinophilia is reduced from 6 months to 4 weeks; (2) addition of requirement for both clonality and abnormal bone marrow morphology (e.g., megakaryocytic or erythroid dysplasia); and, (3) elimination of increased blasts (≥2% in peripheral blood or 5-19% in bone marrow) as an alternative to clonality. These criteria improve the distinction between CEL and entities such as idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome and hypereosinophilia of unknown significance [ 22 ]. As the criteria of CEL and its place relative to other disorders with eosinophilia have become well characterized, the qualifier “not otherwise specified” is no longer needed and has been omitted from the name.…”
Section: Myeloproliferative Neoplasmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to emphasize that having an unremarkable bone marrow by histology does not exclude a clonal process and necessitates further evaluation. 124 Bone marrow biopsy interpretation recommendation-mastocytosis. Although H&E can easily detect clusters of mast cells, they are not always present; thus, one should have a low threshold for using additional special stains (Giemsa) or IHC to detect mast cell-mediated disease.…”
Section: Bone Marrow Biopsy: Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…151 Thus, in patients with HE for which bone marrow assessment does not yield a specific diagnosis, it is indicated to perform IHC for tryptase, CD117, and CD25 to assess for SM. 124 Because abnormal mast cells can be seen in both MLNeo and SM, positive IHC should be followed by further testing, including KIT mutation assessment as discussed in the ''Ancillary testing for mastocytosis'' section.…”
Section: Bone Marrow Biopsy: Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%