2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13836.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test suite for quantitative comparison of hydrodynamic codes in astrophysics

Abstract: We test four commonly used astrophysical simulation codes, enzo, flash, gadget and hydra, using a suite of numerical problems with analytic initial and final states. Situations similar to the conditions of these tests, a Sod shock, a Sedov blast, and both a static and translating King sphere, occur commonly in astrophysics, where the accurate treatment of shocks, sound waves, supernovae explosions and collapsed haloes is a key condition for obtaining reliable validated simulations. We demonstrate that comparab… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
161
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constructing adequate models for these effects, including them all in simulations, and correctly determining their relative contributions to the overall structure formation process, is a highly non-trivial process. Indeed, various code comparison projects over the years [298,299,300,301,302] have shown disagreement between codes on the order of tens of percent, and comparison with observations [e.g. 290] suggests that baryon-inclusive simulations are only good at the 10% accuracy level so far.…”
Section: Simulating the Universementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructing adequate models for these effects, including them all in simulations, and correctly determining their relative contributions to the overall structure formation process, is a highly non-trivial process. Indeed, various code comparison projects over the years [298,299,300,301,302] have shown disagreement between codes on the order of tens of percent, and comparison with observations [e.g. 290] suggests that baryon-inclusive simulations are only good at the 10% accuracy level so far.…”
Section: Simulating the Universementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, comparisons between the results produced by AMR and SPH codes in a number of test cases reveal several differences (Frenk et al 1999;O'Shea et al 2005b;Agertz et al 2007;Wadsley et al 2008;Tasker et al 2008;Mitchell et al 2009). Agertz et al (2007) showed that the formation of fluid instabilities is artificially suppressed in SPH codes compared to AMR codes because of the difficulties of SPH codes in properly modeling the large density gradients that develop at the fluid interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is intimately connected with the outstanding problem of star formation: as star formation transforms the ISM, adding heavy elements and kinetic energy, it determines the structure and evolution of galaxies. While modern cosmological theories can predict the distribution of dark matter in the Universe quite well, predicting the distribution of stars and gas in galaxies is still extremely difficult (Tasker et al 2008;Putman et al 2009;Tonnesen & Bryan 2009). The reason for this is the complex and dynamic ISM: simulations reach a bottleneck on scale sizes where a detailed understanding of star formation, its feedback, and the interaction between galactic disks and halos needs to be included (Stanimirović 2010).…”
Section: Galaxy Evolution Begins At Homementioning
confidence: 99%