1938
DOI: 10.2307/2980656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test of Tippett's Random Sampling Numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the same as the one given in Table I of reference [11]. The mean value of i is 22.5 and its standard deviation is (41.25)us = 6.4226.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is the same as the one given in Table I of reference [11]. The mean value of i is 22.5 and its standard deviation is (41.25)us = 6.4226.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…This test, as applied here, consists in taking the sum of the five digits comprising a (poker) hand as the variable, denoted by the symbol i, say, and comparing its distribution over the various hands with the one expected theoretically. The latter may be obtained in an elegant manner as follows (refer to the alternative approach of Yule [11]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the data will not be found to follow any observed pattern(s). See [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] for details on other methodologies and results. The choice of using the used recharge cards of GSM network operator was based on the fact that their recharge cards are produced by strong computational algorithms that are programmed to generate random digits and numbers.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-, 9 to test Tippett's digits for randomness and did not find any evidence of nonrandomness. Yule (1938) suspected Tippett's digits of being "patchy." To test this "hypothesis," he added sequences of five digits at a time going down column by column, page by page.…”
Section: Tests Of Random Numbers and Random Digitsmentioning
confidence: 96%