2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2005.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of the Tate equation to predict bubble size at an orifice in the presence of frother

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4% decrease from 0 to 144.4 μM for F150 and 2% from 0 to 175.1 μM for DF250). This is consistent with the observation of Hernandez-Aguilar et al 22 They further concluded that the impact of the frother on reducing the bubble size cannot be explained solely by the decrease in equilibrium surface tension, even under quasi-static conditions. One reason may be that equilibrium is still not attained, but there could be others.…”
Section: ■ Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…4% decrease from 0 to 144.4 μM for F150 and 2% from 0 to 175.1 μM for DF250). This is consistent with the observation of Hernandez-Aguilar et al 22 They further concluded that the impact of the frother on reducing the bubble size cannot be explained solely by the decrease in equilibrium surface tension, even under quasi-static conditions. One reason may be that equilibrium is still not attained, but there could be others.…”
Section: ■ Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Laboratory bubble size from an orifice is controlled by several factors such as orifice diameter, gas flux (Vazquez et al, unpublished data), orientation (Winkel et al 2004), horizontal water velocity (Tsuge et al 1981), and surfactant contamination (Hernandez-Aguilar et al 2006) including bubble oiliness (Leifer and Boles 2005). Φ for the range of capillary tubes used in the present laboratory studies was well described by a Gaussian function.…”
Section: Minor Ventsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(11) shows another example for DF-250 produced by two different American and Canadian manufacturers, in term of surface activity. In experience, polyglycol ethers produced from butanol and ethylene oxide are more selective and have better carrying power than similar frothers produced from butanol and caustic soda [7,30].…”
Section: D) Polyglycol Ethersmentioning
confidence: 99%