A Test of the Revised Minkov-Hofstede Model of Culture: Mirror Images of Subjective and Objective Culture across Nations and the 50 US States

Abstract

Various models of subjective culture (measures of self-reports) have been proposed since Hofstede’s original work but none of them have been validated by showing that they have analogs in objective culture (measures of societal practices). Inspired by Bardi and Schwartz’s discovery that Schwartz’s individual-level circumplex values model has an exact equivalent in a model of behaviors, we develop a test for the purpose of validating models of culture. We apply this test to Minkov’s revised two-dimensional variant of Hofstede’s subjective-culture model, consisting of individualism-collectivism (IDV-COLL) and flexibility-monumentalism (FLX-MON) (formerly “long-term orientation”), as Fog recently found that an analog to this model incorporates and summarizes all major validated models and dimensions of national culture. We analyze national measures of important social practices associated empirically and theoretically with IDV-COLL and FLX-MON: transparency-corruption, gender equality, political freedom, road death tolls, homicide rates, family structures, innovation rates, and educational effort and achievement. These yielded close analogs to IDV-COLL and FLX-MON, with similar factor structures across nations and across the 50 US states, explicable in terms of IDV-COLL, FLX-MON, and life-history strategy (LHS) theories. Thus, subjective culture structures have mirror images in objective culture structures. This provides validation for our test, for the Minkov-Hofstede two-dimensional model of culture, for the use of nations and some sub-national political entities as units of cultural analysis, as well as for IDV-COLL, FLX-MON, and LHS theories.

Are Different Two-Dimensional Models of Culture Just a Matter of Different Rotations? Evidence From the Analysis Based on the WVS/EVS

“…Two dimensions are easy to show and grasp on two-dimensional figures. Moreover, often similarities between cultural maps and geographical maps are sought (Fog, 2021; Minkov, 2018; Minkov & Kaasa, 2021b) and this can be most easily done with two-dimensional cultural models.…”

The Influence of National Culture Dimensions on Agile Implementations in the South African Software Development Context

“…The GLOBE future orientation dimension also reflects societal aspirations and preferences for planning. Although criticisms regarding the inconsistency for Hofstede uncertainty avoidance and masculinity national culture dimensions exist (Minkov & Kaasa, 2021), the study provides findings for both extremes of these dimensions in the context of South African Agile software development teams. Power distance is the extent to which people with less power expect and accept that the decision-making power is distributed unequally (Hofstede, 2013;House et al, 1999).…”

Do Americans seek pleasure while Chinese care about others’ approval? Examining stereotypical utilities positioning in brand choice contexts

“…The same latent variable regression models were used when predicting single choice under the two cognitive load conditions. The differences in various cultural dimensions are represented by nations (Hofstede, 1980(Hofstede, , 2011Minkov and Kaasa, 2021). Thus, in all studies, we used nationality affiliation to Americans and Chinese as an operationalization of Western and Eastern cultures (Kim and Aggarwal, 2016;Würtz, 2005).…”