1987
DOI: 10.2307/1059326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test of the Relative Income Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we find the same condition for the ordinal relationship between growth rates to be destroyed as in the case that agents adopt linear feedback strategies, (23), even if they adopt nonlinear ones.…”
Section: Nonlinear Strategiessupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we find the same condition for the ordinal relationship between growth rates to be destroyed as in the case that agents adopt linear feedback strategies, (23), even if they adopt nonlinear ones.…”
Section: Nonlinear Strategiessupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Since the first multiplying term is positive by Assumption 2.1, the growth rate in the feedback Nash equilibrium becomes higher than that in the open-loop Nash equilibrium if and only if (23) holds.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Growth Rates Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solving for first-order conditions and denoting the elasticity of R(X) with respect to X as E RX, where E RX equals to Xf(X)R(X), both Frank (1985) and Kosicki (1987b) stated that E RX decreases in R(X) for any f(X) likely to be observed in practice. Kosicki further proved that if E RX is decreasing in R(x), it also decreases in income rank G(M).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending Frank (1985)'s work, Kosicki (1987bKosicki ( , 1990) presented a utility maximization framework in which concern for the relative standing in the current consumption hierarchy was integrated with a permanent income framework. The results revealed that permanent income as well as income rank, are important determinants of saving rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%