2002
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2002.2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of speciation via sexual selection on female preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, we found the same kind of non-linear functions in an entirely different experiment (data unpublished). In particular, we selected for increased mating propensity in the same way as described here, while we were concomitantly selecting for divergent courtship repertoire (instead of selecting for increased assortative mating, see Meffert & Regan, 2002). Thus, we have confidence in our assertion that we had initial positive selection responses followed by long-term fitness declines, but also that the short-term responses for increased mating activity improved the flow of the protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…More importantly, we found the same kind of non-linear functions in an entirely different experiment (data unpublished). In particular, we selected for increased mating propensity in the same way as described here, while we were concomitantly selecting for divergent courtship repertoire (instead of selecting for increased assortative mating, see Meffert & Regan, 2002). Thus, we have confidence in our assertion that we had initial positive selection responses followed by long-term fitness declines, but also that the short-term responses for increased mating activity improved the flow of the protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These concordant responses for increased mating propensity were most likely due to our direct selection pressures for increased values of this fitness parameter. It is less likely that the selection protocols on the multivariate components of courtship performance would have directly caused the concordant increases in mating propensity because the lines did exhibit significant differences in courtship displays (Meffert and Regan 2002;data unpublished). The increased inbreeding pressure due to the selection protocols, however, could have contributed indirectly to the pleiotropic fitness declines (see Lande 1995;Lynch et al 1995;Whitlock 2000), most notable in Phase I of the experiment (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This design was intended to test whether a founder-flush event would alter selection responses for divergence in the ''shape'' of courtship (see Meffert and Regan 2002). We used the same base population from Phase 1 that had been maintained in the laboratory at the standard husbandry size of~1000 individuals for a total of 36 generations.…”
Section: Phase 2 Protocol Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations