2019
DOI: 10.2172/1545757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test of ASTM Methods E1245-03 and E562-11 in Calculating the Volume Fraction of Carbides in a U-10Mo Foil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the phase quantification an automatic image analysis has been applied on the acquired micrographs. The image analysis method has been selected against the point count method because the latter is slower, more tedious and presents difficulties to evaluate the very fine morphology of the strain-induced martensite (Lopez et al, 2019;Talonen et al, 2004). The automatic analysis has been applied using MATLAB software (MathWorks Inc., MA, United States).…”
Section: Quantitative Light Optical Micrographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the phase quantification an automatic image analysis has been applied on the acquired micrographs. The image analysis method has been selected against the point count method because the latter is slower, more tedious and presents difficulties to evaluate the very fine morphology of the strain-induced martensite (Lopez et al, 2019;Talonen et al, 2004). The automatic analysis has been applied using MATLAB software (MathWorks Inc., MA, United States).…”
Section: Quantitative Light Optical Micrographymentioning
confidence: 99%