1986
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1986.10885680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test of Alternative Cloze Test Formats at the Sixth-Grade Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite support for the cloze and maze as measures of reading comprehension, researchers have identified many concerns with these measures. For example, the cloze was criticized for being difficult and frustrating for students and only testing surface level skills (Pikulski & Pikulski, 1977) and for lacking alternate-form reliability (Gillingham & Garner, 1992;Helfeldt, Henk, & Fotos, 1986). In regards to the maze, researchers examined issues with the types of distracters, deletion strategy (e.g., fixed, random, lexical), and relevance of context.…”
Section: Problems With the Cloze And Mazementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite support for the cloze and maze as measures of reading comprehension, researchers have identified many concerns with these measures. For example, the cloze was criticized for being difficult and frustrating for students and only testing surface level skills (Pikulski & Pikulski, 1977) and for lacking alternate-form reliability (Gillingham & Garner, 1992;Helfeldt, Henk, & Fotos, 1986). In regards to the maze, researchers examined issues with the types of distracters, deletion strategy (e.g., fixed, random, lexical), and relevance of context.…”
Section: Problems With the Cloze And Mazementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that the fixed deletion ratio used in a cloze task (i.e., every n th word) may result in systematic sampling, potentially resulting in reduced reliability and validity (Helfeldt & Henk, 1985). In an attempt to address concerns about the deletion strategy with cloze measures, researchers explored alternate methods for creating cloze passages such as randomizing the blanks throughout the text and providing a dash for every letter of the target word (Helfeldt et al, 1986). A total random deletion procedure entails removing words at irregular intervals throughout a passage; however, the number of blank spaces between words cannot be controlled.…”
Section: Problems With the Cloze And Mazementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloze tasks have been thought to be a proxy for text readability (Helfeldt, Henk, & Fotos, 1986; Hare, 1984), intrasentence and intersentence comprehension (McKenna & Layton, 1990, Shanahan, Kamil, & Tobin, 1982), and local comprehension (Kintsch & Yarbrough, 1982). If cloze were a good proxy, it could be a useful tool for diagnosing reading skill deficits, because it is easy to construct and administer.…”
Section: Cloze Maze and Summary Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cloze and maze are similar because they rely on vocabulary and sentence context, but neither relies directly on higher levels of text comprehension (e.g., intersentence and paragraph comprehension). To determine any hierarchical pattern between lower and higher levels of text, we expanded the maze task from its form in earlier research (Helfeldt et al, 1986;Klare, 1984;McKenna & Layton, 1990, Shanahan et al, 1982 in Studies 1 and 2 to include sentence-level and paragraph-level mazes. The sentence-level mazes represent a sentence-level comprehension task.…”
Section: Cloze Maze and Summary Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were primarily nouns. The initial letter of each deleted word was provided as cues (Helfeldt et al, 1986) with solid lines of equal length (Greenewald, 1981). Scoring used classical test theory sum of items correct, with no adjustment made for word difficulty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%