Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Automation of Software Test 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1370042.1370052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test generation solution to automate software testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A model-based testing approach is presented by Bouquet et al in [16]. Their approach is based on a combination of class, object, and state diagrams, which can be found in UML and OCL expressions to automatically generate test cases from these models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model-based testing approach is presented by Bouquet et al in [16]. Their approach is based on a combination of class, object, and state diagrams, which can be found in UML and OCL expressions to automatically generate test cases from these models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within vulnerability testing approach, negative test cases 6 have to be produced: typically, attack scenarios to obtain data from the SUT in an unauthorized manner. The proposed process to perform vulnerability testing, depicted in Figure 1, is composed of the four following activities: All these MBVT activities are supported by a dedicated toolchain, which is based on an existing MBT software named CertifyIt [3], [4] provided by the company Smartesting 7 .…”
Section: A Principles Of the Mbvt Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symbolic execution techniques are applied to derive abstract test cases according to model coverage criteria or use-case scenarios. These generated abstract test cases can finally be concretized into executable test scripts that aim to evaluate functional conformance of the SUT with respect to the associated UML test model [1,2]. Smartesting Test Designer TM clearly defines the keystone of the toolchain proposed within the project VETESS.…”
Section: Mbt Process Using Smartesting Test Designer Tmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graph of Java objects that represents a model can be serialized and deserialized in XML using the XStream tool. 2 As such, the translation from UML4MBT to TDMODEL is just one-to-one translation between models of the same nature but with different (Java-based) technologies. The translation tools make thus possible for a UML4MBT model to be processed to generate test cases.…”
Section: Test Model Exportmentioning
confidence: 99%