2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2012.6187003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Terrain Relative Navigation sensor enabled by multi-core processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent description of a commercial TBN system for aircraft has been done by Cowie et al (2008). More recently, TBN has also been proposed to be used on several space exploration missions, namely for planetary entry, descent and landing by Alexander et al (2012) and Johnson and Montgomery (2008). For a recent review on the different TBN solutions for aerial vehicles, refer to works by Karabork (2010); Vaman (2012) and the references therein.…”
Section: Terrain Based Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent description of a commercial TBN system for aircraft has been done by Cowie et al (2008). More recently, TBN has also been proposed to be used on several space exploration missions, namely for planetary entry, descent and landing by Alexander et al (2012) and Johnson and Montgomery (2008). For a recent review on the different TBN solutions for aerial vehicles, refer to works by Karabork (2010); Vaman (2012) and the references therein.…”
Section: Terrain Based Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another related tool is that of APLNav described by Adams et al that stores a map of the reference surface and renders “expected images” for correlation and comparison to those collected by the mobile sensor. The work presented by Alexander et al describes the many tools employed by these sophisticated image processing techniques, including but not limited to (a) map rendering and shading; (b) image normalization, shifting, and scaling; (c) map and image rectification; (d) the fast Fourier transform (FFT); and (e) spatial correlation of the image with the reference map. In addition, another theme present in these types of terrain aiding procedures, referred to as “image‐correlation” methods in this work, is the use of a past (stochastic) navigation solution to construct the “measurement” provided by the sensor, either as a warm start for the map‐to‐image correlation methods or to construct an “expected image” of the environment.…”
Section: Landing Navigation With Terrain Camerasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work chooses to shift the computational burden from advanced image processing to new developments in state‐of‐the‐art multitarget filtering techniques, rather than forcing a data type into a format that can be crudely interpreted as a traditionally modeled measurement type. The key to this approach is to track the features in collected images as “targets” without requiring knowledge of their identity and, in lieu of correlating them to a known reference map via spatial correlation of rendered and expected images such as in previous studies, instead using the “interesting” data within the images directly as features, such as making use of Harris corners, scale‐invariant feature transform (SIFT) features, or speeded up robust features (SURF) . The resulting navigation scheme sheds most of the advanced image processing in favor of a well‐modeled data type without any required reliance on an a priori reference map and, indeed, returns to treating the landing navigation problem as a SLAM problem.…”
Section: Landing Navigation With Terrain Camerasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations