Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3132847.3133116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Temporal Attentional Model for Rumor Stance Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For task A, we will provide code for a state-of-the-art baseline from RumourEval 2017 Task A (Kochkina, Liakata, and Augenstein 2017) together with later higher-performing entry published at RANLP that year (Aker, Derczynski, and Bontcheva 2017). The latest state of the art system for stance classification on RumourEval 2017 Task A dataset (Veyseh et al 2017) may be provided in case of successful implementation.…”
Section: Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For task A, we will provide code for a state-of-the-art baseline from RumourEval 2017 Task A (Kochkina, Liakata, and Augenstein 2017) together with later higher-performing entry published at RANLP that year (Aker, Derczynski, and Bontcheva 2017). The latest state of the art system for stance classification on RumourEval 2017 Task A dataset (Veyseh et al 2017) may be provided in case of successful implementation.…”
Section: Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, CNN processes the text information in a parallel way. By introducing self attention mechanism, CNN can achieve satisfactory results for the rumor stance classification [17]- [26]. In addition, some scholars consider the sequential relation between replies.…”
Section: B Stance Classification Based On Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few years, there is a growing interest in studying rumor stance classification task in social media [6]- [9], but conventional methods do not consider the temporal correlation between replies. In order to extract textual features and temporal correlation between replies [10]- [13], Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and the attention mechanism are proposed to finish this classification task [14], [15]. However, these models neglect the reading habits of the public.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the main task of rumor detection, there are other approaches that attempt to detect the stance of the replies toward the main post and then detect the rumor [13], [16]. It has been shown that for this task the evolution of the people's stance toward the main post is very helpful and considering time series is important for this problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%