2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2017.8037299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A template subtraction method for the removal of cardiogenic oscillations on esophageal pressure signals

Abstract: Esophageal pressure (P) is usually measured in patients receiving mechanical ventilation and is used for the assessment of lung mechanics. However, its interpretation is complicated by the presence of cardiogenic oscillations (CGO). In this article we present a novel method for the reduction of CGO based on the identification of pressure templates. Similar approaches are known for the removal of electrocardiographic (ECG) artifacts from the electromyogram (EMG). The proposed method is tested on clinical record… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All four algorithmic families -TS, model-based, waveletbased, and EMD-based algorithms -have been shown to perform well in comparison to other approaches for the removal of cardiac artifacts [21], [25], [28], [29]. In particular, note that single-channel adaptations of the popular adaptive filtering approach [14], on the one hand, have been clearly shown to perform inferior compared to the modelbased approaches [21], and on the other hand represent close but less adaptive relatives of the TS algorithm [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All four algorithmic families -TS, model-based, waveletbased, and EMD-based algorithms -have been shown to perform well in comparison to other approaches for the removal of cardiac artifacts [21], [25], [28], [29]. In particular, note that single-channel adaptations of the popular adaptive filtering approach [14], on the one hand, have been clearly shown to perform inferior compared to the modelbased approaches [21], and on the other hand represent close but less adaptive relatives of the TS algorithm [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct comparison of performance of the proposed signal denoising technique with that of other techniques which are reported in [4], [6], [7], [8] and [9] is not possible as the performance these techniques are evaluated with different settings and databases. However, in [6], the simulated signals were added with artificial and white Gaussian noise (WGN) to have a signal-to-noise ratio of 10 dB, and then the noisy signals are denoised.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A template subtraction-based technique is proposed by Grabhoff et alin [9] for the removal of from signal. Here also, in [9], a reference-signal, namely electromyogram (EMG) is required to generate a template of the signal. The techniqueis designed based on three main steps: detection of the R-peak-indices from EMG signal, template generation and template subtraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations