2007
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0710.2335
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes: non-spinning binaries

P. Ajith,
S. Babak,
Y. Chen
et al.
Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the parameter space's dimensionality is effectively reduced from 6 to 2 (non-precessing) or 3 (precessing) [105][106][107] * * -at least for the inspiral waveforms. Based on experience with both the one-dimensional non-spinning case [80,86,88,90] and nonprecessing cases [87,91,92,109], we expect that in each parameter space's dimension ∼5 numerical-relativity waveforms will be sufficient. The feasibility of producing a nonprecessing-binary model using either a handful of non-precessing waveforms in the small mass ratio limit [109] and only two waveforms in the equal-mass case [85,87], or ∼5 2 = 25 waveforms in the comparable mass case, has been demonstrated in the EOB and phenomenological models in Refs.…”
Section: Spanning the Binary Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that the parameter space's dimensionality is effectively reduced from 6 to 2 (non-precessing) or 3 (precessing) [105][106][107] * * -at least for the inspiral waveforms. Based on experience with both the one-dimensional non-spinning case [80,86,88,90] and nonprecessing cases [87,91,92,109], we expect that in each parameter space's dimension ∼5 numerical-relativity waveforms will be sufficient. The feasibility of producing a nonprecessing-binary model using either a handful of non-precessing waveforms in the small mass ratio limit [109] and only two waveforms in the equal-mass case [85,87], or ∼5 2 = 25 waveforms in the comparable mass case, has been demonstrated in the EOB and phenomenological models in Refs.…”
Section: Spanning the Binary Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second class of phenomenological inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform models has also been developed, starting with [89,90]. In this case, the original motivation was to provide LIGO and Virgo detectors with inspiral, merger and ringdown waveforms that could be computed efficiently during searches and be used to observe high-mass binary black holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EOB models require solving for the time evolution of the binary inspiral to obtain the GW signal, which is computationally expensive and makes the dependence on parameters less transparent. More efficient waveform models are those that directly provide a description of the GWs in the frequency-domain, either from phenomenological models [31][32][33][34][35][36], reduced-order models for EOB [37][38][39][40], or surrogates of numerical-relativity (NR) waveforms [41,42]. Frequency-domain models calibrated to numerical-relativity (NR) simulations in the tidal sector [40,[43][44][45] phenomenologically describe an enhancement of matter effects compared to predictions from adiabatic tidal models, however, these models depend only on the tidal deformability parameters and are restricted in their parameter space coverage, hence are of limited applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fix the integration constant C such that f PBH ≡ (ρ PBH /ρ DM ) zCMB is the PBH fraction at z = z CMB 1100. For the spectrum dE GW / dν we use commonly adopted fitting formulae [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Gravitational Waves From Merging Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%