1988
DOI: 10.1016/0165-7836(88)90033-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A temperature compensated von bertalanffy growth model for tagged red drum and black drum in Texas bays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sectioned otoliths from fish older than 18 months at capture were measured as follows: At 63× under white ligh, the distance to the nearest ocular micrometer unit (16.26 μm) was measured from the core to the distal edge of the first annulus, taken proximally along the ventral side of the sulcus acousticus. Distances recorded were used as a surrogate for estimating size at age (Doersbacher et al 1988). Using this technique, we could infer relative size at age 18 months (February) for wild year‐classes that had recruited to the population before we had initiated the stocking, regardless of time of capture (e.g., first annulus location for a fish from the 1993 YC collected in fall 1997 could be pooled with that of a fish from the same year‐class collected in summer 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sectioned otoliths from fish older than 18 months at capture were measured as follows: At 63× under white ligh, the distance to the nearest ocular micrometer unit (16.26 μm) was measured from the core to the distal edge of the first annulus, taken proximally along the ventral side of the sulcus acousticus. Distances recorded were used as a surrogate for estimating size at age (Doersbacher et al 1988). Using this technique, we could infer relative size at age 18 months (February) for wild year‐classes that had recruited to the population before we had initiated the stocking, regardless of time of capture (e.g., first annulus location for a fish from the 1993 YC collected in fall 1997 could be pooled with that of a fish from the same year‐class collected in summer 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() found a significantly better fit ( P < 0.001) when growth was modeled for each sex separately than when sexes were aggregated in the analysis, whereas other studies aggregated the sexes (Rohr ; Wakefield and Colura ; Doerzbacher et al. ; Murphy and Taylor ; Matlock ; Porch ). From a model specification perspective, the von Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF) is commonly used to describe the length‐at‐age relationship (Beckman et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There is broad variation in reported age-growth models for Red Drum because of disagreement on the presence of sexually dimorphic growth and because there remains some question about which models best describe individual growth dynamics. Beckman et al (1989) found a significantly better fit (P < 0.001) when growth was modeled for each sex separately than when sexes were aggregated in the analysis, whereas other studies aggregated the sexes (Rohr 1980;Wakefield and Colura 1983;Doerzbacher et al 1988;Murphy and Taylor 1990;Matlock 1992;Porch 2000). From a model specification perspective, the von Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF) is commonly used to describe the length-at-age relationship (Beckman et al 1989;Murphy and Taylor 1990;Ross et al 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth rates of juvenile black drum in Texas have been determined by ana· lyzing length-frequency modes (Pearson, 1929;Simmons and Breuer, 1962). Tagging programs have also provided information on drum growth in Texas bays (Doerzbacher, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%