2012
DOI: 10.4000/jtei.476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A TEI Schema for the Representation of Computer-mediated Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies suggest these messages bear characteristics that resemble spoken rather than written language (Chun, 1994;Lamy & Hampel, 2007,). However, as Beißwenger et al, (2012) underline, one characteristic of synchronous text chat is that each message is posted as a block. Therefore, revisions to the message that are apparent to the other interlocutors cannot be made partway through the construction of the message.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies suggest these messages bear characteristics that resemble spoken rather than written language (Chun, 1994;Lamy & Hampel, 2007,). However, as Beißwenger et al, (2012) underline, one characteristic of synchronous text chat is that each message is posted as a block. Therefore, revisions to the message that are apparent to the other interlocutors cannot be made partway through the construction of the message.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The domain of CMC is a recent and prominent example of an "area that the TEI has not yet envisioned". Several approaches to customise TEI P5 for the annotation of CMC corpora published in 2012, 2014 and 2016 (Beißwenger et al 2012, Chanier et al 2014, Margaretha & Lüngen 2014, Lüngen et al 2016 and discussed at TEI conferences and members' meetings have proven that TEI P5 provides a useful platform for the definition of representation schemas for CMC. Nevertheless, as long as a model for the representation of CMC is available "only" in form of TEI customisations, the official TEI standard is not up-to-date to cover this very prominent domain of discourse which, in the past few years, has become a subject of studies in a broad range of disciplines (within and beyond the humanities).…”
Section: Representing Cmc In Tei: Fundamental Decisions and Consideramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four schemas have not been developed independently; instead, the schemas mark milestones on a path on which the previous schema, and the lessons learnt in using it for the representation of corpora, provided the basis for the development of the next schema in line. The schema developed in the context of a planned German reference corpus on CMC published in the TEI Journal ('DeRiK schema', Beißwenger et al 2012) as well as its variant adapted for representing a German Wikipedia corpus (Margaretha & Lüngen 2014) marked the initial points in that process. The French CoMeRe group around Thierry Chanier adapted and extended the DeRiK schema to represent 14 existing French CMC corpora on different CMC genres in a uniform and interoperable way ('CoMeRe schema', Chanier et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the STTS tagset for annotation. Annotation rules for social media characteristics are given in [15], [16] and [17]. The general tagger model is taken from [4] and explained in Subsection III-A.…”
Section: Webtaggermentioning
confidence: 99%